- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:32:03 +0200
- To: public-webrtc-editors@w3.org
Den 23. april 2015 17:41, skrev Dominique Hazael-Massieux: > On 23/04/2015 14:47, Dan Burnett wrote: >>> - We'll switch webrtc when all the features we need are supported, and >>> someone else assures us it all works for them. >> >> Agreed. > > Out of curiosity, I pasted the WebIDL fragments from the WebRTC spec > into a skeleton spec that would use the new contiguous mode (attached). > > I detected one-crashing bug when using our getter on RTCStatsReport > (which is one of the "special operations" and so documented as not > supported), so I've removed it from the attached test. > > It's not obvious what lack of supports for union types and partial > dictionaries would entail, but it might just be lack of testing, since > in that rough test, they seem to be working fine. > > Dom This sounds much better than I was fearing. It wouldn't be the first time a project's list of "unimplemented features" was out of sync with the actual software :-) Can you file a bug with them (or find a bug to attach to) saying "we need getter support"?
Received on Friday, 24 April 2015 08:32:33 UTC