- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:25:02 -0600
- To: List WebPlatform public <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFDDJ7zuQvjqZ=LKBgbZbBEZGRcpxcU8XqTZhcYYdyF-HOxD+w@mail.gmail.com>
Hello everyone, If you read these emails regularly, you know that there have been a number of infrastructure activities going on in order to get webplatform.orglooking professional and ready for public consumption, so that we can remove the big purple "*Web Platform Docs is in alpha <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:FAQ>*" warning that is currently on the top of every page. A key part of this is the new article-by-article readiness marker system, so that we can clearly indicate to readers which individual pages still need work and which are ready to use. We currently have the templates in place [1], and Jen Simmons is working on adding some style to make the information part of the layout instead of a warning box [2]. However, for all that to mean anything we need to assign a readiness state to each an every article. Currently there are 4408 articles showing up in my search of pages that use the readiness template [3], of which 4405 are "Unreviewed". In the weekly teleconferences, it was agreed that the best approach was to do this was to divide the articles up among regular contributors (people who are familiar with the content expectations and the structure of the site), and assign readiness states manually. *If you can participate, please add your name to the list on the QA Sprint project page:* *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint>* (Note that I've already signed up the "usual suspects", so you might want to check and remove your name if you're busy all June!) At the same time as the readiness review, since we don't want to do this again any time soon, we would also want to take care of any other clean-up tasks that need to be done manually by someone familiar with the site. We therefore need to decide on a checklist of Quality Assurance tasks. These have to be simple, quick assignments that someone can do without any additional research, and which will make a meaningful improvement to the consistency and reliability of the site content. So far we have: *The QA Checklist for June 2014 QA Sprint:* 1. Assign a readiness state. More about readiness states (requires clean-up) 2. Add any details about readiness/what is required to the editorial notes box. 3. For DOM method pages, assign index values to the parameter entries in order to get the correct syntax to display, as described in this email post. 4. Confirm that the new compatibility tables are pulling in the correct data (Doug Schepers is going to give us more information about this once the import from MDN happens later this week). Possible additions (if we have enough volunteers that we can afford to spend more time per page): 1. Ensure that every page has a summary section. I've added a couple other sections and ideas to that project page [4], but everything else is still pretty tentative. Ideas and initiative welcome -- I'm not going to have time to do much extra work on this myself, but we wanted to get the ball rolling sooner rather than later. Best, Amelia [1]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2014May/0061.html [2]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2014May/0056.html [3]: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Property:State [4]: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2014 20:25:31 UTC