- From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 21:14:57 +0000
- To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, "Brian J. Hong" <hong.brian.j@gmail.com>
- CC: Jen Simmons <jen@jensimmons.com>, List WebPlatform public <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <c2b649873af94553a756420106c51bba@BL2PR03MB228.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
+1 Thanks, PhistucK, for answering. Eliot From: PhistucK [mailto:phistuck@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 12:12 PM To: Brian J. Hong Cc: Eliot Graff; Jen Simmons; List WebPlatform public Subject: Re: -ms prefixed CSS properties?? (That means, you can rename/move it or create a new page with the same content and attribution but without the prefix, if there is a standard API that corresponds to the same - prefix less - name with the same purpose) ☆PhistucK On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:10 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com<mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> wrote: Generally, yes. It is the same for any proprietary feature. ☆PhistucK On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Brian J. Hong <hong.brian.j@gmail.com<mailto:hong.brian.j@gmail.com>> wrote: Does that mean we should be marking the MSCSS Matrix Object proprietary and a candidate for deletion as well? or is that separate? Thanks! On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com<mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>> wrote: Yes, you’re correct. When we donated the content from MSDN, we donated everything we had, knowing that there was proprietary content in there that we need to weed out. Please mark these as candidates for deletion, and you should also feel free to alter or remove any text within a topic that is proprietary, unless it is pointing out different implementation behaviors or something like that. Thanks, Eliot From: jensimmons@gmail.com<mailto:jensimmons@gmail.com> [mailto:jensimmons@gmail.com<mailto:jensimmons@gmail.com>] On Behalf Of Jen Simmons Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 10:16 AM To: List WebPlatform public Subject: -ms prefixed CSS properties?? There are 19 pages in the CSS Docs for -ms prefixed properties. Like this: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/ms-grid-row-align But that seems inconsistent. We don't have separate pages for all the other prefixes, right? Everything for CSS Grid should be on grid pages, not on separate (separately-alaphbetized) pages — yes? I'm thinking these should be deleted or deprecated... but I'm not sure. They are: ms-grid-columns ms-grid-row ms-grid-row-align ms-grid-row-span ms-grid-rows ms-scroll-chaining ms-scroll-limit ms-scroll-limit-xMin ms-scroll-limit-xMax ms-scroll-yMax ms-scroll-limit-yMin ms-scroll-rails ms-scroll-snap-points-x ms-scroll-snap-points-y ms-scroll-snap-type ms-scroll-snap-x ms-scroll-snap-y ms-scroll-translation ms-touch-select Plus, MediaWiki problematically removes the dash, so the titles of these pages are themselves a mistake. It should be "-ms-grid-row" not "ms-grid-row". If we do have pages like these, we'll have to figure out what to do about the fact they are so misleading without the prefix dash. Jen Jen Simmons designer, consultant and speaker host of The Web Ahead jensimmons.com<http://jensimmons.com> 5by5.tv/webahead<http://5by5.tv/webahead> twitter: jensimmons<http://twitter.com/jensimmons>
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 21:15:50 UTC