W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Max blog post--review

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 23:00:49 -0500
Message-ID: <52F1B771.4@w3.org>
To: Ric <ric@webplatform.com>
CC: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Hi, Ric–

I'm sure we will find many issues, missing items, or things that could 
be represented differently. As Max says in his blog post, this is not 
the end of the JS documentation process on WPD, it's just the beginning!

Let's document the mistakes or omissions we find, perhaps in the issue 
tracker, and set that up as one of the next phase tasks to improve the docs.

Regards-
-Doug


On 2/4/14 10:02 PM, Ric wrote:
> Are there still outstanding issues from the import?
>
> On the object page, it is missing some information from the original page
> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/javascript/objects
> I can understand removing the Vb objects, but the Map is gone as well?
>
> Also, the function page did not import all the properties
> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/javascript/Function
> It currently only shows the prototype, and this links to the wrong page.
>
> Ric Johnson
>
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com
> <mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi All.
>>
>> I have placed a preview of a blog post we’d like to publish today up
>> for your eyes. Max Polk is the author, and he relates the works he’s
>> done in porting the JavaScript reference from MSDN to WPD.
>>
>> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=830&preview=1&_ppp=04f4cc1741
>>
>> Can some people please review this post at your earliest convenience
>> and let me know if it looks good to you for publication?
>>
>> Thanks so much,
>>
>> Eliot
>>
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 04:00:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:58 UTC