Re: working on text-underline property finished

LOL. Just let us know here or on #webplatform — tomorrow, you'll have
company. There will be a doc sprint in Seattle! J

----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee

From:  Łukasz ŝak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
Date:  Friday, June 21, 2013 3:40 PM
To:  julee <julee@adobe.com>
Cc:  PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org"
<public-webplatform@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: working on text-underline property finished


Julee of course. But on something much more popular than text-underline
properties ;-) I can choose when I back to home.

22 cze 2013 00:22, "Julee" <julee@adobe.com> napisał(a):
> Sorry, PhistucK: I didn't see anywhere where they're obsoleted. But if they're
> not part of the specs and they're not implemented, we shouldn't doc them. I'll
> add that to the notes.
> 
> WooCaSh: Are there other properties you want to work on instead?
> 
> Julee
> 
> 
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
> 
> From:  PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
> Date:  Friday, June 21, 2013 2:59 PM
> To:  julee <julee@adobe.com>
> Cc:  julee <jburdeki@adobe.com>, Łukasz ŝak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>,
> "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
> Subject:  Re: working on text-underline property finished
> 
> Only text-underline-position is a real (standards oriented) property. The
> others are obsolete should not have their own pages, unless these pages merely
> redirect to the shorthand property (or inform the reader that they are
> obsolete and should not be used and suggest the shorthand property).
> 
> 
> ☆PhistucK
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>> PhistucK: I thought they're used as part of the text-underline property.
>> They're not obsolete. Or am I missing something? J
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>> 
>> From:  PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>> Date:  Friday, June 21, 2013 <tel:2013>  2:46 PM
>> To:  julee <jburdeki@adobe.com>
>> Cc:  Łukasz ŝak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org"
>> <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> 
>> Subject:  Re: working on text-underline property finished
>> 
>> Please, mention that the properties are obsolete, not supported and should
>> not be used, where you suggest the correct property.
>> 
>> Thank you!
>> 
>> 
>> ☆PhistucK
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 <tel:2013>  at 12:42 AM, Julee Burdekin
>> <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> Hi, WooCaSh:
>>> 
>>> Please go ahead and fill out the summary table info, and related specs
>>> section, and then in the summary point to the shorthand version. Don't
>>> bother with things like the examples section.
>>> 
>>> Also, you've probably made 10 edits by now, so you should be able to create
>>> pages now. Do you want to try and create a new page for those property pages
>>> that don't yet exist? We do so using the New Page page.[1] If you run into
>>> any problems whatsoever, let me know and I'll do it.
>>> 
>>> Regards!
>>> 
>>> J
>>> 
>>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:New_Page#CSS_Property
>>> ----------------------------
>>> julee@adobe.com
>>> @adobejulee
>>> 
>>> From:  Łukasz ŝak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
>>> Date:  Friday, June 21, 2013 <tel:2013>  4:45 AM
>>> To:  PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>> Cc:  "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, julee
>>> <jburdeki@adobe.com>
>>> 
>>> Subject:  Re: working on text-underline property finished
>>> 
>>> 
>>> So guys, 
>>> Should I continue working on these properties? Or just correct shorthand
>>> version? 
>>> 
>>> 21 cze 2013 <tel:2013>  09:13, "PhistucK" <phistuck@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>>> Sorry for the really late response, but I believe there is no reason to add
>>>> these properties (other than to redirect to the standards oriented version
>>>> of them) - they do not seem to be supported anywhere and are not part of
>>>> any current or emerging standards.
>>>> 
>>>> Like you wrote, only text-underline-position is relevant, but not the rest.
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-3/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ☆PhistucK
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 <tel:2013>  at 11:21 PM, Julee Burdekin
>>>> <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi, PhistucK & WooCaSh & all!
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm trying to assign WooCaSh the longhand properties for text-underline on
>>>>> the WPW page.[1]
>>>>> 
>>>>> The most recent spec I see that defines the longhand properties is the
>>>>> 2003 <tel:2003>  W3C CR spec.[2]
>>>>> 
>>>>> "The 'text-underline' property is the shorthand for 'text-underline-style'
>>>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-style> ,
>>>>> 'text-underline-width'
>>>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-width> ,
>>>>> 'text-underline-color'
>>>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-color> ,
>>>>> 'text-underline-mode'
>>>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-mode>
>>>>> and 'text-underline-position'
>>>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-position>
>>>>> ." Interestingly, text-underline-width is listed as one of the longhand
>>>>> values, but not listed in the value field of the following table. (After
>>>>> that, only text-underline-position is further spec'd,[3] although it's not
>>>>> in the latest working draft.[4])
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, unless someone says otherwise, I've assign WooCaSh to:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 'text-underline-style', 'text-underline-width', 'text-underline-color',
>>>>> and 'text-underline-mode'. ('text-underline-position' was already done.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Julee
>>>>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Meta:web_platform_wednesday
>>>>> [2] 
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-decoration-shorthand
>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/
>>>>> [4] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text/
>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>> julee@adobe.com
>>>>> @adobejulee
>>>>> 
>>>>> From:  PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date:  Friday, June 14, 2013 <tel:2013>  12:30 AM
>>>>> To:  Łukasz ŝak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc:  "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>>> Subject:  Re: working on text-underline property finished
>>>>> Resent-From:  <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>>> Resent-Date:  Friday, June 14, 2013 <tel:2013>  12:31 AM
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have some more elaborated feedback. Again, thank you for working on
>>>>> this!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you sure about the syntax section?
>>>>> Syntax 
>>>>> text-underline: text-underline-mode
>>>>> text-underline: text-underline-position
>>>>> text-underline: text-underline-style
>>>>> text-underline: text-underline-color
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is it enough to just write text-underline: before-edge?
>>>>> (I am not familiar with this module)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Actually, what specification document specifies the text-underline
>>>>> property? I only find the text-underline-position
>>>>> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-underline-position-propert
>>>>> y>  property within the Text Decoration module. And it specifies
>>>>> completely different values (the working draft version specifies them,
>>>>> too)...
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Unicode Standard [UNICODE] as category 'Zs'" should cite its reference,
>>>>> link to the standard and to the category, help the reader get all of the
>>>>> information they need or could use.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The wiki page says "W3C Candidate Recommendation" - you should also link
>>>>> to the said candidate recommendation specification (within the "Related
>>>>> Specifications" section).
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ☆PhistucK
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 <tel:2013>  at 9:24 AM, Łukasz ŝak
>>>>> <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> You can assign me to this longhand properties. Like on shorthand version
>>>>>> there are almost not implemented but I can fill what I already found.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2013/6/14 PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Thank you for working on this!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I believe the longhand properties should have their own pages?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ☆PhistucK
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 <tel:2013>  at 6:42 AM, Łukasz ŝak
>>>>>>> <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> already I finished working on this property. Because there is not too
>>>>>>> much information about this property I write what I can. Please check me
>>>>>>> and give advise if I do something wrong.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Be nice, it's my first doc.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Link: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/text-underline
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Łukasz ŝak / WooCaSh
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Pozdrawiam
>>>>>> Łukasz ŝak 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>