Re: working on text-underline property finished

Julee of course. But on something much more popular than text-underline
properties ;-) I can choose when I back to home.
22 cze 2013 00:22, "Julee" <julee@adobe.com> napisał(a):

> Sorry, PhistucK: I didn't see anywhere where they're obsoleted. But if
> they're not part of the specs and they're not implemented, we shouldn't doc
> them. I'll add that to the notes.
>
> WooCaSh: Are there other properties you want to work on instead?
>
> Julee
>
>
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
>
> From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, June 21, 2013 2:59 PM
> To: julee <julee@adobe.com>
> Cc: julee <jburdeki@adobe.com>, Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>, "
> public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished
>
> Only text-underline-position is a real (standards oriented) property. The
> others are obsolete should not have their own pages, unless these pages
> merely redirect to the shorthand property (or inform the reader that they
> are obsolete and should not be used and suggest the shorthand property).
>
>
> ☆*PhistucK*
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> PhistucK: I thought they're used as part of the text-underline property.
>> They're not obsolete. Or am I missing something? J
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>>
>> From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>> Date: Friday, June 21, 2013 2:46 PM
>> To: julee <jburdeki@adobe.com>
>> Cc: Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <
>> public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>
>> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished
>>
>> Please, mention that the properties are obsolete, not supported and
>> should not be used, where you suggest the correct property.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, WooCaSh:
>>>
>>> Please go ahead and fill out the summary table info, and related specs
>>> section, and then in the summary point to the shorthand version. Don't
>>> bother with things like the examples section.
>>>
>>> Also, you've probably made 10 edits by now, so you should be able to
>>> create pages now. Do you want to try and create a new page for those
>>> property pages that don't yet exist? We do so using the New Page
>>> page.[1] If you run into any problems whatsoever, let me know and I'll do
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Regards!
>>>
>>> J
>>>
>>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:New_Page#CSS_Property
>>> ----------------------------
>>> julee@adobe.com
>>> @adobejulee
>>>
>>> From: Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:45 AM
>>> To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, julee <
>>> jburdeki@adobe.com>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished
>>>
>>> So guys,
>>> Should I continue working on these properties? Or just correct shorthand
>>> version?
>>> 21 cze 2013 09:13, "PhistucK" <phistuck@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>>
>>>> Sorry for the really late response, but I believe there is no reason to
>>>> add these properties (other than to redirect to the standards oriented
>>>> version of them) - they do not seem to be supported anywhere and are not
>>>> part of any current or emerging standards.
>>>>
>>>> Like you wrote, only text-underline-position is relevant, but not the
>>>> rest.
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-3/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, PhistucK & WooCaSh & all!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to assign WooCaSh the longhand properties for
>>>>> text-underline on the WPW page.[1]
>>>>>
>>>>> The most recent spec I see that defines the longhand properties is the
>>>>> 2003 W3C CR spec.[2]
>>>>>
>>>>> "The 'text-underline' property is the shorthand for
>>>>> 'text-underline-style'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-style>
>>>>> , 'text-underline-width'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-width>
>>>>> , 'text-underline-color'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-color>
>>>>> , 'text-underline-mode'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-mode>
>>>>>  and 'text-underline-position'<http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-underline-position>."
>>>>> Interestingly, text-underline-width is listed as one of the longhand
>>>>> values, but not listed in the value field of the following table. (After
>>>>> that, only text-underline-position is further spec'd,[3] although it's not
>>>>> in the latest working draft.[4])
>>>>>
>>>>> So, unless someone says otherwise, I've assign WooCaSh to:
>>>>>
>>>>> 'text-underline-style', 'text-underline-width',
>>>>> 'text-underline-color', and 'text-underline-mode'.
>>>>> ('text-underline-position' was already done.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julee
>>>>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Meta:web_platform_wednesday
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-decoration-shorthand
>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/
>>>>> [4] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text/
>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>> julee@adobe.com
>>>>> @adobejulee
>>>>>
>>>>> From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 12:30 AM
>>>>> To: Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: working on text-underline property finished
>>>>> Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>>> Resent-Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 12:31 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> I have some more elaborated feedback. Again, thank you for working on
>>>>> this!
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you sure about the syntax section?
>>>>> *Syntax *
>>>>> text-underline: text-underline-mode
>>>>> text-underline: text-underline-position
>>>>> text-underline: text-underline-style
>>>>> text-underline: text-underline-color
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it enough to just write text-underline: before-edge?
>>>>> (I am not familiar with this module)
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, what specification document specifies the text-underlineproperty? I only find the
>>>>> text-underline-position<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-underline-position-property> property
>>>>> within the Text Decoration module. And it specifies completely different
>>>>> values (the working draft version specifies them, too)...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Unicode Standard [UNICODE] as category 'Zs'" should cite its
>>>>> reference, link to the standard and to the category, help the reader get
>>>>> all of the information they need or could use.
>>>>>
>>>>> The wiki page says "W3C Candidate Recommendation" - you should also
>>>>> link to the said candidate recommendation specification (within the
>>>>> "Related Specifications" section).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Łukasz Żak <zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You can assign me to this longhand properties. Like on shorthand
>>>>>> version there are almost not implemented but I can fill what I already
>>>>>> found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/6/14 PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for working on this!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe the longhand properties should have their own pages?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Łukasz Żak <
>>>>>>> zlukasz.poczta@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> already I finished working on this property. Because there is not
>>>>>>>> too much information about this property I write what I can. Please check
>>>>>>>> me and give advise if I do something wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Be nice, it's my first doc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Link:
>>>>>>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/text-underline
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Łukasz Żak / WooCaSh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Pozdrawiam
>>>>>> Łukasz Żak
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 22:41:00 UTC