- From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 20:06:22 +0300
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>, Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>, WebPlatform Community <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABc02_Kz0TX4pRXbRCsXjNZk_86uGyMC-aCT7cOou9+T=SAahw@mail.gmail.com>
:( It is PhistucK (or Phistuck, or Phis, or nothing at all), not Phil. As long as toggling it off widens the form again, it sounds fine. ☆*PhistucK* On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, Leanne, Phil- > > We talked about making the TOC togglable... maybe that would help, in > addition to other more automated solutions? > > Regards- > -Doug > > > On 6/7/13 12:38 PM, Lea Verou wrote: > >> Honestly, I don‘t know. I'll need to look into it, but in general MW >> makes it pretty difficult to do things like this. Worst case, we could >> check the URL and add a class with JS. >> >> Lea Verou >> W3C developer relations >> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 7, 2013, at 14:06, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com >> <mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Apology accepted. >>> >>> Perhaps move it beyond the content area, to the sides, in wide screens >>> (1280 and up)? >>> I guess the current approach makes sense in content pages, but less so >>> in editing pages and we could lower the threshold of "wider" there to >>> 1280. >>> Is it possible to separate this logic for content and editing pages? >>> >>> >>> ☆*PhistucK* >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org >>> <mailto:lea@w3.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Apologies about the name, I read it wrong. I thought t was Phil + >>> a last name. Didn't mean to insult you. >>> >>> Regarding the TOC, perhaps we could only show it for wider >>> screens. Thoughts, everyone? >>> >>> Lea Verou >>> W3C developer relations >>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me >>> <http://lea.verou.me/> ✿ @leaverou >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 7, 2013 <tel:2013>, at 13:51, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com >>> <mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> PhistucK (or Phistuck, or Phis, or nothing at all), not Phil. >>>> This is the second time already, which makes this rather insulting. >>>> >>>> The issue is that it narrows the area of the form. >>>> Note that I have a somewhat wide screen (1280x800), so I get >>>> redundant side spacing as well as a narrow form. >>>> >>>> >>>> ☆*PhistucK* >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 <tel:2013> at 7:12 PM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org >>>> >>>> <mailto:lea@w3.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Phil, >>>> >>>> Is that an issue? I edited a page today and I found it very >>>> helpful. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Lea >>>> >>>> Lea Verou >>>> W3C developer relations >>>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me >>>> <http://lea.verou.me/> ✿ @leaverou >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 7, 2013 <tel:2013>, at 13:27, PhistucK >>>> <phistuck@gmail.com <mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Can the table of content be removed when editing pages? >>>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/w/**index.php?title=dom/methods/** >>>>> hasAttributeNS&action=formedit<http://docs.webplatform.org/w/index.php?title=dom/methods/hasAttributeNS&action=formedit> >>>>> It shows up for me there. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ☆*PhistucK* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 <tel:2013> at 3:42 AM, Lea Verou >>>>> >>>>> <lea@w3.org <mailto:lea@w3.org>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the feedback both in the list and in today’s >>>>> call. >>>>> I fixed the issues (hopefully!) and also added media >>>>> queries to make it adapt to smaller screens. So >>>>> currently it's outside the page for resolutions with > >>>>> 1400px width, inside the content area for resolutions >>>>> between 700px and 1400px and a section at the top for >>>>> resolutions below 700px. Furthermore, between 500px and >>>>> 700px it’s two column, whereas below 500px it’s a single >>>>> column list. >>>>> I deployed in current too, so it’s live now. >>>>> >>>>> Hope you like it. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Lea >>>>> >>>>> Lea Verou >>>>> W3C developer relations >>>>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me >>>>> <http://lea.verou.me/> ✿ @leaverou >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On May 24, 2013 <tel:2013>, at 19:20, Mike Sierra >>>>> <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.**com<letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com> >>>>> <mailto:letmespellitoutforyou@**gmail.com<letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I like it a lot better floating outside the content. >>>>>> The animation seems jerky, which is odd considering it >>>>>> uses CSS transitions. Are there any cases throughout >>>>>> the site in which a TOC might run so long that it might >>>>>> not fully display within the vertical screen area? If >>>>>> so, I suggest accordion-style B-heads. Also, a bug: >>>>>> you can keep scrolling down once you're at the bottom >>>>>> of the content, with more empty space added underneath >>>>>> the main content as you go. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 <tel:2013> at 11:13 AM, Lea Verou >>>>>> >>>>>> <lea@w3.org <mailto:lea@w3.org>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> As you might have noticed there are several issues >>>>>> with the TOC pushing down content with clear:both; >>>>>> or content overlapping it (e.g. flags). Yesterday I >>>>>> tried to solve those issues, by moving the TOC >>>>>> outside the content div (but inside the content >>>>>> area) and making it scroll on the free space to the >>>>>> right of the content, as the page is scrolled. Doug >>>>>> suggested I move it outside the content area >>>>>> entirely, so I made a quick mockup which you can >>>>>> find here [1]. It’s not perfect but it should give >>>>>> you a rough idea of how it will look. >>>>>> The issue with that is that it requires a pretty >>>>>> large resolution so we would have to move it in the >>>>>> content area for resolutions < 1440px wide anyway. >>>>>> Also, I don't like the contrast of the dot with the >>>>>> background colors, but this could perhaps be fixed, >>>>>> maybe by tweaking its design a bit. The problem >>>>>> with my original approach is that it makes the >>>>>> content narrower. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? Do you prefer this idea or do you think >>>>>> the TOC inside the content area would work better? >>>>>> >>>>>> [1]: >>>>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/** >>>>>> test/css/properties/border-**radius<http://docs.webplatform.org/test/css/properties/border-radius> >>>>>> >>>>>> Lea Verou >>>>>> W3C developer relations >>>>>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me >>>>>> <http://lea.verou.me/> ✿ @leaverou >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 17:07:31 UTC