- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:02:45 -0400
- To: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
- CC: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>, WebPlatform Community <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Hi, Leanne, Phil- We talked about making the TOC togglable... maybe that would help, in addition to other more automated solutions? Regards- -Doug On 6/7/13 12:38 PM, Lea Verou wrote: > Honestly, I don‘t know. I'll need to look into it, but in general MW > makes it pretty difficult to do things like this. Worst case, we could > check the URL and add a class with JS. > > Lea Verou > W3C developer relations > http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou > > > > > > > On Jun 7, 2013, at 14:06, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com > <mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Apology accepted. >> >> Perhaps move it beyond the content area, to the sides, in wide screens >> (1280 and up)? >> I guess the current approach makes sense in content pages, but less so >> in editing pages and we could lower the threshold of "wider" there to >> 1280. >> Is it possible to separate this logic for content and editing pages? >> >> >> ☆*PhistucK* >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org >> <mailto:lea@w3.org>> wrote: >> >> Apologies about the name, I read it wrong. I thought t was Phil + >> a last name. Didn't mean to insult you. >> >> Regarding the TOC, perhaps we could only show it for wider >> screens. Thoughts, everyone? >> >> Lea Verou >> W3C developer relations >> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me >> <http://lea.verou.me/> ✿ @leaverou >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 7, 2013 <tel:2013>, at 13:51, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com >> <mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> PhistucK (or Phistuck, or Phis, or nothing at all), not Phil. >>> This is the second time already, which makes this rather insulting. >>> >>> The issue is that it narrows the area of the form. >>> Note that I have a somewhat wide screen (1280x800), so I get >>> redundant side spacing as well as a narrow form. >>> >>> >>> ☆*PhistucK* >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 <tel:2013> at 7:12 PM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org >>> <mailto:lea@w3.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Phil, >>> >>> Is that an issue? I edited a page today and I found it very >>> helpful. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lea >>> >>> Lea Verou >>> W3C developer relations >>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me >>> <http://lea.verou.me/> ✿ @leaverou >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 7, 2013 <tel:2013>, at 13:27, PhistucK >>> <phistuck@gmail.com <mailto:phistuck@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> Can the table of content be removed when editing pages? >>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/w/index.php?title=dom/methods/hasAttributeNS&action=formedit >>>> It shows up for me there. >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> >>>> ☆*PhistucK* >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 <tel:2013> at 3:42 AM, Lea Verou >>>> <lea@w3.org <mailto:lea@w3.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the feedback both in the list and in today’s >>>> call. >>>> I fixed the issues (hopefully!) and also added media >>>> queries to make it adapt to smaller screens. So >>>> currently it's outside the page for resolutions with > >>>> 1400px width, inside the content area for resolutions >>>> between 700px and 1400px and a section at the top for >>>> resolutions below 700px. Furthermore, between 500px and >>>> 700px it’s two column, whereas below 500px it’s a single >>>> column list. >>>> I deployed in current too, so it’s live now. >>>> >>>> Hope you like it. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Lea >>>> >>>> Lea Verou >>>> W3C developer relations >>>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me >>>> <http://lea.verou.me/> ✿ @leaverou >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On May 24, 2013 <tel:2013>, at 19:20, Mike Sierra >>>> <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I like it a lot better floating outside the content. >>>>> The animation seems jerky, which is odd considering it >>>>> uses CSS transitions. Are there any cases throughout >>>>> the site in which a TOC might run so long that it might >>>>> not fully display within the vertical screen area? If >>>>> so, I suggest accordion-style B-heads. Also, a bug: >>>>> you can keep scrolling down once you're at the bottom >>>>> of the content, with more empty space added underneath >>>>> the main content as you go. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 <tel:2013> at 11:13 AM, Lea Verou >>>>> <lea@w3.org <mailto:lea@w3.org>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> As you might have noticed there are several issues >>>>> with the TOC pushing down content with clear:both; >>>>> or content overlapping it (e.g. flags). Yesterday I >>>>> tried to solve those issues, by moving the TOC >>>>> outside the content div (but inside the content >>>>> area) and making it scroll on the free space to the >>>>> right of the content, as the page is scrolled. Doug >>>>> suggested I move it outside the content area >>>>> entirely, so I made a quick mockup which you can >>>>> find here [1]. It’s not perfect but it should give >>>>> you a rough idea of how it will look. >>>>> The issue with that is that it requires a pretty >>>>> large resolution so we would have to move it in the >>>>> content area for resolutions < 1440px wide anyway. >>>>> Also, I don't like the contrast of the dot with the >>>>> background colors, but this could perhaps be fixed, >>>>> maybe by tweaking its design a bit. The problem >>>>> with my original approach is that it makes the >>>>> content narrower. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? Do you prefer this idea or do you think >>>>> the TOC inside the content area would work better? >>>>> >>>>> [1]: >>>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/test/css/properties/border-radius >>>>> >>>>> Lea Verou >>>>> W3C developer relations >>>>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿http://lea.verou.me >>>>> <http://lea.verou.me/> ✿ @leaverou >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 17:02:52 UTC