Re: Project Management update.

Hi Garbee,

Apparently the infamous Session Bug somehow got closed in Bugzilla. But it
is still a big problem. I need to re-file two bugs related to this. Do I
use the new system or the old Bugzilla?

+Scott



On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote:

> The Content component import is finished! You should now be able to use
> the Content project [1] within the new solution to keep track of things.
> Once again, if you have any issues using the new install or have any
> questions, you can post them in the Project Management System project [2]
> or get in touch with me any other way you can and I can help you out.
>
> Some things are currently left in the component on Bugzilla. This is
> because they are going to be put into different projects which don't exist
> yet. So hang tight if you want to talk about one that is left sitting.
>
> -Garbee
>
> [1] http://project.webplatform.org/content
> [2] http://project.webplatform.org/prmg
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>wrote:
>
>>  Thanks for the warning. ;-)****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Jonathan Garbee [mailto:jonathan@garbee.me]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:36 PM
>> *To:* public-webplatform@w3.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Project Management update.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> In a few minutes I am going to begin importing the Content component bugs
>> from Bugzilla over to the new system. The way imports are going to work is
>> I will import and bring over the initial description of an issue. If there
>> are any other comments, I am going to do my best to bring the content from
>> them over as well (on some that may have a lot of conversation, we will
>> see. But I think most of those are resolved now.) As the issues are ported
>> over, I am going to close them as "RESOLVED" and "MOVED" while also linking
>> over to the new issue in our project management system. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> So, to anyone who is signed up for the bugzilla mailing list, get ready
>> for inbox spamming! ;P****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> -Garbee****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
>> wrote:****
>>
>>  I think that is discussion for another thread/time. Right now it really
>> doesn't matter since our install doesn't work with OpenID.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:19 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:****
>>
>>  Once MediaWiki supports OpenID, I see no reason to have any other login
>> mechanism. We want to advocate open systems and secure practices, which is
>> what OpenID is about, unless I am mistaken.
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ☆*PhistucK*****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
>> wrote:****
>>
>>  That has been planned. The module for it needs some patches before we
>> can use it. That is one of the bugs being imported into the new system. ;)
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> It would only go one-way, so once we get support for having TBG talk to
>> the MW user base, we wouldn't use the OpenID system anymore since those
>> users wouldn't be in the MW DB. Unless, if people signed up through TBG it
>> would go into that DB, but I would be interested to see how that goes
>> seeing how TBG stores the OpenID data.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:07 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:****
>>
>>  And what about making MediaWiki have OpenID support?
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ☆*PhistucK*****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
>> wrote:****
>>
>>  The system uses its own user DB. There is no module for letting it work
>> with a MediaWiki DB. It does have OpenID support, so this mitigates a bit
>> of the frustrations with needing another account. Getting it to work with
>> our current user DB is something to have done at some point.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> -Garbee****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:42 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:****
>>
>>  How do I log in?****
>>
>> My docs.webplatform.org username and password do not work. Is this
>> intentional? Will this be fixed?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thank you for working on this!
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ☆*PhistucK*****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
>> wrote:****
>>
>>  So, this is about to get inceptiony. Due to a bug in the current ACL
>> setup for TBG, the "General" settings actually don't work as they should.
>> :P So each project's permissions need to be manually set, which makes
>> creating them more time consuming then I originally estimated. It won't be
>> too bad though, just need to take them on one at a time compared to rushing
>> through creating them all at once as initially planned.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Now, time for inception. I went ahead (completely without asking anyone)
>> and setup a project for tracking issues with the bug genie install (yes,
>> you can burn me at the stake for not asking, but let's do that after it is
>> all configured.) It is public and located here (
>> http://project.webplatform.org/prmg .) The "prmg" in the URL is for
>> "Project Management" and the actual title is "Project Management System."
>> So, for any issues or questions about using the system, just post in there.
>> There is one issue in particular currently which is about the import of the
>> current projects located here (
>> http://project.webplatform.org/prmg/issues/PRMG-2 .) It has the list I
>> am going to import the current projects in. Please comment if you have any
>> suggestions or problems with the import order.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks,****
>>
>> -Garbee****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote:
>> ****
>>
>>  Looking good, Garbee!****
>>
>> +Scott****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
>> wrote:****
>>
>>  So, here we are. The Bug Genie is installed at
>> http://project.webplatform.org ! It is currently empty, so don't go
>> rushing over just yet. I'm finishing up a project that I have been caught
>> up in for about a month now within the next two days. So, Tuesday or
>> Wednesday will be when I begin configuring our TBG install. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I'm estimating that should take me about two work days to get done and
>> test, perhaps three if I end up getting confused in the ACL (which is
>> pretty easy to do.) After that I will begin importing the issues from the
>> current Bugzilla repo into the new system. This will be done one component
>> per day to try and not burn myself out in the move and to try and do some
>> extra cleanup as well. As each component's move is completed I will update
>> the list to know to start using TBG for those issues. As far as the order
>> of the move, I will email out the order they will be done the day I start,
>> needless to say Content and Infrastructure are on the top of my list.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Probably the biggest question, support/documentation for TBG. This, isn't
>> a good answer I'm afraid. There is very little documentation on TBG's
>> actual usage. So at first, it really is just ask me any questions you have
>> via any method you can (coming to my house excluded, my dogs like to bark
>> at new visitors and it drives me nuts.) I will work on documenting the
>> actual usage of TBG first for us. Once that documentation is completed I
>> will work on documenting administration aspects of usage. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> If anyone has any specific questions about this process, please just let
>> me know. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks for your time,****
>>
>> -Garbee****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>>   ** **
>>
>>  ** **
>>
>>  ** **
>>
>>  ** **
>>
>>  ** **
>>
>>  ** **
>>
>>  ** **
>>
>>  ** **
>>
>>  ** **
>>
>
>