I believe Scott means whether there are css/properties/foo and css/functions/foo (for example). ☆*PhistucK* On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: > > > On 14 Feb 2013, at 19:58, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote: > > > Hi Julee! > > > > I think we'd be safe eliminating the "properties" namespace node - as > long as there is no like named other CSS element such as a selector or unit > or something. I'm not sure if this is the case or not. > > > > I'll defer to the experts - like Chris Mills (ha! got you back, Chris!) > > ;-) > > I'm not 100% sure I understand the question, sorry. > > we have > > css/tutorials > css/properties > css/selectors > css/functions > css/atrules > css/mediaqueries > css/data_types > css/colors > > and that's it for now, afaik. > >Received on Friday, 15 February 2013 10:22:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:40 UTC