Re: An question aside (Re: A categorization/placing problem - event/property pages)

I believe Scott means whether there are css/properties/foo and
css/functions/foo (for example).

☆*PhistucK*


On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 14 Feb 2013, at 19:58, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Julee!
> >
> > I think we'd be safe eliminating the "properties" namespace node - as
> long as there is no like named other CSS element such as a selector or unit
> or something. I'm not sure if this is the case or not.
> >
> > I'll defer to the experts - like Chris Mills (ha! got you back, Chris!)
>
> ;-)
>
> I'm not 100% sure I understand the question, sorry.
>
> we have
>
> css/tutorials
> css/properties
> css/selectors
> css/functions
> css/atrules
> css/mediaqueries
> css/data_types
> css/colors
>
> and that's it for now, afaik.
>
>