- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:11:00 -0400
- To: pdsouza@about.com
- CC: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Hi, Patrick- As much as I appreciate Frozenice's many contributions, I feel the same way about this particular issue. Before the launch, I bought the wpd.cc domain for the same purpose, but I was afraid of just this, that it would get indexed, so I didn't really promote it. I wasn't sure that it would be harmful; I'm glas that someone with SEO skills can speak definitively about it. Lea pointed out earlier that Twitter has a fixed length for all links, so the shortener isn't needed there, and in fact they use their own shortener, so it would be doubly-redirected. I do like the idea of shortlinks like webplatform.org/apis/canvas to http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis/canvas, for links in slides, etc. If Frozenice were to install his shortener on webplatform.org, would that still hurt SEO? Regards- -Doug On 4/23/13 2:59 AM, Patrick D'Souza wrote: > Hi, > > It has been brought to my notice that wpd.mx has been setup as a url > shortener for webplatform.org urls. for e.g. wpd.mx/apis/canvas 301s to > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis/canvas. > <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis/canvas> > This url has been indexed by Google and I don't like the thought of > different urls pointing to the same content when a user is searching for > canvas in a search engine. It dilutes the positive effects of a > webplatform.org url. > > Sorry to be a little picky but we should avoid all such short urls which > confuse a user and in turn result in duplicate content being served to > search engines. I see the benefit of a url shortener as it can be useful > in social media campaigns as well as brand promotion for > webplatform.org. I propose we use this url shortener on webplatform.org > itself for e.g. webplatform.org/font-size which would redirect to > docs.webplatform.org/css/properties/font-size. Every 301 is one > additional request for a user which is not good in terms of performance. > I would appreciate if we avoid 301s as far as possible unless it's > absolutely required. Always, keep it simple :) > > Any thoughts and feedback are much appreciated. > > - Patrick > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 07:11:17 UTC