- From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:23:32 -0700
- To: Taylor Costello <nottaylorcostello@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPwaZpVb=rL+ZAEdMQjGKE9o_gRQMh4P90mUAD2K5ymODxAD5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Interesting, I hadn't realized that. The way we currently have the forms/templates set up, ideally editors should never have to manually add categories to a page--they should be able to be checked on in the forms, or be included automatically based on the page type. The "Tutorials" category is an example of a category that should be automatically deposited on pages that are using the Tutorial page type/form. Any categories listed on this page: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Category:Topics should be done by checking off that topic in the form when editing the page. --Alex On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Taylor Costello < nottaylorcostello@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys! > > There are 670 pages using the wiki markup syntax that is used to place > pages into a Category instead of the Topics template. I was curious if > these pages are meant to be uniform and also using the Topics template? I > guess what I'm asking is should I be replacing all of the Category text on > these pages with the Topics template? > > Here is the list of pages (included syntax they are using instead of > templates): > http://pastebin.com/edJigzdP > > I would obviously avoid the Meta: pages (they are meant to be merged) and > any page that is a template, but there's the list if anyone wants to help. >
Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 18:24:19 UTC