- From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:29:48 -0500
- To: public-webplatform@w3.org
Unless we could get a Single Sign On system going with the Wiki I don't think it would actually end up being too productive, in fact more counterproductive. What I think it would cause is us using the time and energy to move the system, then recreate our accounts and configure it properly. At that point anyone else would need to recreate their accounts to submit new tickets or updates. All just for a temporary system to have in-house until we figure out a better solution. I think the people that care to will make an account, otherwise they tend to find somewhere to let us know about bugs (typically the chatroom) and we just deal with it for them. So, without SSO as a bonus, I don't see too much reason to host bugzilla ourselves at the moment as a temporary solution; it seems to me like moving domains just to do it with no added benefit of doing so. I will install a test setup locally of the latest bugzilla tomorrow and test it out to see what new features are in the most modern build. I will see if any of them are really tempting to include which would make the move worth the effort as a temporary solution. -Garbee On 11/25/2012 8:51 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: > Hi, Garbee- > > Regarding the bug-tracker: While I agree with you that nobody (myself > included) likes Bugzilla very much, we could host our own version of a > more modern and better-configured Bugzilla as a stable stop-gap for > our ultimate solution, which we could keep experimenting with. This > would remove the problem of having to have a new account for filing > bugs, and we could easily import all our old bugs. Thoughts? > > Regards- > -Doug >
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 22:30:18 UTC