- From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 23:25:50 -0800
- To: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
- Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHZLcPqXG4sM8WK1=jc74eWHPpMMn4p5JUQw_6PfQCNrQGoXUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you frozenice and Alex for nailing that bug! Earlier Alex had asked for a summary of the methodology and architecture proposed. I appreciate the need for greater clarity. *== Problem ==* * Contributors and users cannot create and locate pages in the apis namespace because the namespace architecture is inadequate to the task. The architecture has the following problems:* * * Does not differentiate between an API’s common name (WebRTC) and the actual JavaScript objects that provide the programmatic API (MediaStream). More...<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Creating_API_pages#No_differentiation_between_objects_and_listings> * * * Inaccurately describes the relationship between the API objects and their members - events, methods, and properties (by omitting the object identifier or using the wrong casing on it). More...<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Creating_API_pages#Delineation_is_inaccurate> * * * Does not provide for duplicate member names of the same member type, for example two properties named label, each a property of a different object. More...<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Creating_API_pages#Dublicate_names_in_conflict> Problems with forms and templates are somewhat related to the problems with the architecture. Various fixes to these are needed to round out the larger solution for usability. More...<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Creating_API_pages#Template_and_form_fixes_needed> == Solution ==* * A methodology for creating new content is part of the solution.* * * For each common-name API, create only one API Listing page as a top level page for the API; follow casing rules; include any other common names for the API in the page content; consistently follow the methodology, even for singleton APIs. More...<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Creating_API_pages#Listing_page> * * * Introduce a new namespace identifier, objects and locate all api object pages under it. More...<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Creating_API_pages#Stubbing_out_the_pages> * * Also, a new architecture is needed.* * * The proposed new architecture is as follows:* * apis apis/apilist apis/apilist/objects/apiObject/events apis/apilist/objects/apiObject/methods apis/apilist/objects/apiObject/properties* * More clarity about how to create the pages is required.* * * Provide guidelines to creating URLs for API pages in the WPD:New_Page<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:New_Page>page .* * * Develop the forms and templates used in creating new apis pages. TODO’s in this section<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Creating_API_pages#Filling_in_the_pages> * * Implied with this methodology is the need to reorganize the existing content according to the new model.* +Scott On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> When I visit the page, apis/indexedDB/properties/direction<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis/indexedDB/properties/direction>, >> no text (like "Property of apis/indexedDB/IDBCursor") appears on the page. >> Nor does such text appear on the other properties pages of IDBCursor, even >> though all of these pages do have "apis/indexedDB/IDBCursor" in the >> Applies_to field. >> > > That was an odd bug. I just fixed it (although I'm not entirely sure how; > the change I made should have netted to a no-op). > >> >> The methods pages of IDBCursor, such as apis/indexedDB/methods/advance<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis/indexedDB/methods/advance>do have the text. >> >> There is a bug somewhere. This is not a caching problem. I'll continue to >> look into it. I appreciate your advice. >> >> +Scott >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi Scott, >>> >>> Thanks for writing this up! >>> >>> The organization is confusing me a bit since it bounces back and forth >>> between between critiquing the current setup, proposing changes, and >>> describing how to practically accomplish things in the current set-up (I >>> think? It may describe how to accomplish things in the hypothetical >>> future). Is there a crisp summary of the changes you propose? >>> >>> Also, note that your point about the Applies_to field not working for >>> things like apis/indexedDB/IDBCursor is incorrect--it was actually just a >>> caching problem. After you update the applies_to field, you often need to >>> do a hard refresh (Edit > Refresh from within the page) of the page where >>> you want it to show up. We should document this somewhere, perhaps next to >>> the Applies_to field itself. >>> >>> --Alex >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>wrote: >>> >>>> When I sat down to document the process for creating API pages, using >>>> the WebRTC documentation as the poster child, I found more questions than >>>> answers. I realized that we did not have a good story here, so I did my >>>> best to fill in the holes with a methodology that attempts to solve the >>>> problems I found. >>>> >>>> You find this methodology described in WPD:Creating_API_pages<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Creating_API_pages> >>>> . >>>> >>>> Note that it started out as a how-to for contributors, but quickly >>>> became a proposal. So parts of it will read either way. Don't be alarmed. >>>> The purpose of the document is to provide you with a methodology to try on >>>> as you do what I did - test it out with your own API pages. >>>> >>>> As you do, please don't update the methodology in that page - let's >>>> discuss it first. We can use this thread for the discussion. >>>> >>>> Thanks for your help! >>>> >>>> +Scott >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 07:26:18 UTC