- From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:24:48 +0200
- To: Michael Del Tito <mdeltito@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>, public-webplatform@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABc02_+hq2kQ8W5e3UAZCizBmcON96C6M7fi_t25JXJzbtSo2w@mail.gmail.com>
I think we want screen readers to ignore them as well, since it is a duplicate anyway. ☆*PhistucK* On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Michael Del Tito <mdeltito@gmail.com>wrote: > It would probably make more sense to leave those headings accessible to > screen readers by using the visuallyhidden technique which is also found in > h5bp: > > http://css-tricks.com/places-its-tempting-to-use-display-none-but-dont/ > > This may also be better for SEO since I believe Google dislikes hidden H1 > elements. Not that this really matters that much in the long term, but it > is an easy drop in replacement for display: none for the time being until > the headings are removed. > On Dec 18, 2012 8:52 AM, "Jonathan Garbee" <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote: > >> Multiple H1 is not bad for SEO or "semantics" if used properly. >> Further, forget about SEO completely; at this point we should focus on >> getting content updated and formatted properly and not worry about stupid >> SEO. The point is it is just annoying to have multiple title headings. For >> now, display none will work until we figure out how to have the pages >> generated properly. >> >> -Garbee >> >> On 12/18/2012 8:08 AM, PhistucK wrote: >> >> Duplicate <h1> is really bad semantically and due to this fact, it is >> also really bad for SEO reasons. >> This must be removed from the HTML itself, not only dynamically/using CSS. >> >> ☆*PhistucK* >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: >> >>> I was just thinking about that annoying issue we've got, where we have >>> duplicate <h1>s on a page: one of my personal pet peeves. >>> >>> The auto generated <h1> has got a class of firstHeading (and an ID the >>> same, for that matter). If just put >>> >>> .firstHeading { display: none; } >>> >>> In common.css, surely that would get rid of our issue? >>> >>> I haven't done it yet, because I thought I'd just check that it wouldn't >>> ruin anything on the site first. It does mean that we'd need to make sure >>> titles are manually added to all pages (via =a manual h1=, or by using the >>> title for field in the form templates.) >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Chris Mills >>> Opera Software, dev.opera.com >>> W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org >>> Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M) >>> >>> >>> >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 14:25:56 UTC