- From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:13:45 +0000
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Sébastien Desbenoit <seb@desbenoit.net>
- Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org
Thanks for the discussion on the remaining icons to be finalised last night. Some good thoughts here. My opinion: * Seb's CSS icon rocks, and we should go with it. Looks much better and more intuitive than either the CSS building blocks thing, or the W3C CSS3 logo thing. * For the HTML icon, we should go with just the shield, as I think this is well known enough now, and it works in the space provided. Having the shield with the angle brackets inside would defo be too busy * I really like Doug's mockup up of a new DOM icon. Seb, are you happy with it. Let me know if you are able to come up with a finished icon set today. I think the others are basically finished, and all you need to do now is draw up a new DOM icon. Does that work? On 13 Dec 2012, at 22:35, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, Séb- > > On 12/13/12 4:53 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: >> >> On 12/13/12 4:02 PM, Sébastien Desbenoit wrote: >> >>> I edit the DOM too, but DOM is more abstract, so we have me free space. >>> >>> DOM -> icons-DOM-2 >>> <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1288> >> >> Still too busy. Maybe rethink the whole thing, away from the tree >> iconography? or use a different nesting metaphor? Sorry to be >> unhelpful... I'll play with a couple ideas myself. > > What about something like this? > > http://docs.webplatform.org/w/images/a/aa/dom-icon.svg > > Just an idea... > > I also thought of nested blocks. Just different ways of showing hierarchy. (I used this one because it has "tree-like" shapes, and forms a "D".) > > Regards- > -Doug
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 10:14:23 UTC