- From: Julee Burdekin <julee@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:42:43 -0800
- To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
- CC: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
No problem. We'll discuss in a few minutes and let you know of any ideas/progress. J -----Original Message----- From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> Date: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:41 AM To: julee <jburdeki@adobe.com> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org> Subject: Re: A finished icon proposal for the WPD main topics > >On 13 Dec 2012, at 18:22, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Wow. This is great! I'll add it to our agenda today in the Content >> Meeting. A couple of question: >> >> 1. How do these pages relate to the global nav? >> >> * Docs = http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/TEST:main_page? > >Yes. > >> * Where do reference pages get highlighted in the nav? > >In the nav on webplatform.org, at the moment they don't. they currently >don't on main page either. The current thinking is to first split up by >technology, then ref/learning pages (concept/tut). > >But as Eliot said in that thread the other day, we should allow people to >start their search by technology or page type, which i think is >reasonable. So do we have different main pages, one broken up by >technology, and others broken into ref docs/learning docs? Or something >else? Good to discuss, certainly. > >> >> 2. In the email you reference, below >> >>(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2012Dec/0172.html >>), >> you ask for topic domain leads for each of the major topic areas. Did >>you >> get any takers? Are you still taking "general concepts" and CSS, and >> looking for: >> >> * beginners >> * HTML >> * accessibility >> * javascript >> * dom >> * svg > >Yup, you got it. > >No, I didn't get any takers. > >Right, I really gotta run.
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 19:43:29 UTC