- From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:18:41 +0200
- To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org, seb@desbenoit.net
- Message-ID: <CABc02_L0bmBDntARs_X_uyLxDRUQ=NhZU+4KHG3KP1pf-WzSbg@mail.gmail.com>
I increased the side padding by 2 pixels. Are you sure the colors are fine? It seems kind of detached or seems to stick out a little too much (or maybe it should, so people do not use non standard/deprecated stuff). Should I also add a title to it? "This is a (Non Standard|Deprecated) feature. Any use of this feature is discouraged."? Should a similar box show in the page of the non standard/deprecated feature itself? ☆*PhistucK* On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: > Looks pretty good to me - nice and readable, fits well with the overall > look of the page. Maybe just add about 2px of extra left and right padding > to the boxes, to make it look more even on all sides > > Chris Mills > Open standards evangelist and dev.opera.com editor, Opera Software > Co-chair, web education community group, W3C > Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" ( > http://my.opera.com/chrismills/blog/2012/07/12/practical-css3-my-book-is-finally-published > ) > > * Try Opera: http://www.opera.com > * Learn about the latest open standards technologies and techniques: > http://dev.opera.com > * Contribute to web education: http://www.w3.org/community/webed/ > > On 5 Dec 2012, at 09:43, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Can someone take a look at the indications and let me know whether the > color/box/design is fine? > > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Template:API_Listing_New > > > > You can see it next to "MSStream". > > > > ☆PhistucK > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> > > Date: Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:45 AM > > Subject: Re: Missing Essentials > > To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> > > Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org > > > > > > 13. Indicate a method/property is non standard, deprecated and so on. > > Add a few check boxes to the API method/property/object (and more...) > templates to indicate that it is non standard, deprecated, proprietary or > obsolete (supported only in Netscape 2, for example, or only on HTML 3) - > each of them should get a check box. > > This information should show up on the property/method tables of the > "Applies to..." object. Ideally, anything marked as such would reside in a > separate section below everything that is standard/current, so users would > not be encouraged to use it. > > > > There's an ability to mark any reference article (including > Methods/Properties) as being standard/obsolete/non-standard, etc. Making > it so that those would be pulled out in the summary tables on API Objects > should be relatively easy. Another good thing t o > > > > I gave it a shot. I created two test bed templates for this purpose - > > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Template:API_Listing_New > > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Template:Summary_Table_Body_New > > > > These look good! > > > > A few questions - > > 1. How do you test template changes? I created new templates just for > the sake of experimentation, because I would not want to break all of the > template users while experimenting/making changes. Is there another way? > > > > I'm embarrassed to admit that what I've done up until now is just made > the changes on the live templates and quickly checked to make sure they > didn't obviously break anything. The way you've done it here is better for > non-trivial changes. > > > > 2. I added a #switch that searches for Non-Standard or Deprecated (I > could easily add more, if needed, like Obsolete, which I think should be > added to the Standardization_Status options) and adds a styled span (it > would be better if I used a class and added it to some global CSS). Does > that seem fine (the style could use some work, of course ;))? > > > > Yeah, this approach seems perfect. > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2012 13:19:58 UTC