Re: Drafting spam solution

This was supposed to be just a sample task on the roadmap, and I put your name down for it because I wasn't sure who to put for it. This certainly doesn't mean you're tied to it ;-)

And from the conversation we had on the meeting today, and some of the stuff NotTomato has been working on, I'm not so sure if it is a serious problem anymore. I guess the task now is more like "Investigate ongoing seriousness of spam."

Chris Mills
Open standards evangelist and dev.opera.com editor, Opera Software
Co-chair, web education community group, W3C
Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://my.opera.com/chrismills/blog/2012/07/12/practical-css3-my-book-is-finally-published)

* Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
* Learn about the latest open standards technologies and techniques: http://dev.opera.com
* Contribute to web education: http://www.w3.org/community/webed/

On 4 Dec 2012, at 19:04, Julee Burdekin <julee@adobe.com> wrote:

> Hi, Chris & everyone:
> 
> I'm looking at the Task Roadmap:
> 
> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Task_Roadmap
> 
> The first column for Content says:
> 
> Draft spam solution
> Julee B
> Relevant bug?
> 
> I couldn't find a bug for this, and haven't seen the topic on the mail
> list.
> 
> I want to make sure I'm defining the issue accurately when filing a bug.
> So, please let me know what spam issues you've seen.
> 
> Thanks much!
> 
> Julee
> 
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 20:30:42 UTC