- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 23:07:49 +0000
- To: public-webplatform-bugs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19855 Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |komoroske@google.com --- Comment #2 from Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> --- (In reply to comment #1) > Relevant properties done. Some remarks for Alex: > > * Property:Image - rarely used, mostly SVG articles, even assigned with old > := Syntax > * Property:Is_parameter_for - only contains some bogus pages (srsly, where > did it get those pound signs from) Do you have some examples of where these are used? > * Property:Is_return_value_for, Property:Is_property_of, > Property:Has_method_type, Property:Has_object, Property:Has_summary, > Property:Has_syntax, Property:Has_description, Property:Has_name, > Property:See_also_javascript_method - again with Date, are those needed for > something? Where are these used? > * Property:Path - is that used? It's going to be used quite a bit on the API_Listing pages to select sub-pages. It's a workaround for a limitation in SMW query syntax. > * Property:CSS_object_model_property - not filled by pages, the ones that > did provided inconsistent values Where is this one coming from? > * Property:css/selectors/pseudo-elements/ - some pages tried to link to > [[css/selectors/pseudo-elements/::after]] etc. ?? > * Property:Applies_To - unused / inconsistent; although there's > Property:Applies_to, that's css specific though as it seems > * Property:Language - only used by Form:data_type (Category:Data_Type = only > 2 articles) > * some erroneous properties were fixed by correctly casing them Thanks so much for looking into this!! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 23:07:50 UTC