- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:12:25 +0200
- To: Sam Mbale <smbale@gmail.com>
- Cc: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+eFz_+C_KffS-pKfW2La7exL9S1zZo6RYxE6UqePz=Twv1nkA@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Melvin, Have a looked at paymentpointers.org? The voucher could be $vouchersforyou.com/87t88yef76df7td7wtde7twde which translates to https://vouchersforyou.com/87t88yef76df7td7wtde7twde and is de-referenceable. Adrian On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 11:43, Sam Mbale <smbale@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > This might off topic, but I thought about what Michiel highlighted: > > > > > > *Maybe start by base64-decoding it? But what would you see then, and how > would that refer to a party who is willing to "cash" the voucher? There > could be some indication of some account identifier at some ledger, but for > that, you would need some more mechanics than just the opaque URI scheme. > An interesting approach to that problem is Interledger addresses, for > instance. * > > > This could be a practical example > New Age of Digital Asset Exchanges - Japan's Largest Gift Card Exchange > Pioneers Blockchain Expansion > <http://wire.mpelembe.net/pr-newswire-news-releases/?rkey=20190820EN43448&filter=9768> > > Tom Kanazawa, the chairman of Amaten said: *"The current system and > technology used for gift card is completely obsolete and dates all the way > back to the mid 90s. It has never evolved to match today's digital world. > It still suffers from basic fundamental shortcomings and is very > inconvenient. I believe that the gift card industry can be a perfect use > case for blockchain. The two are a completely natural fit.**We have > chosen to partner with the best blockchain technology providers in the > space, aelf, because they offer the scalability, dedicated sidechains and > smart contract modules that we very much need to build our service rapidly > and most cost effectively. We are wholeheartedly excited for the future of > truly digitized gift card industry."* > > All the best > Sam > > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 07:39, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org> > wrote: > >> Hi Melvin, >> >> Great topic! I like how the scheme is very generic, but maybe at the same >> time that's a downside, because how would you dereference >> 'urn:voucher:12345abcd ...'? Maybe start by base64-decoding it? But what >> would you see then, and how would that refer to a party who is willing to >> "cash" the voucher? There could be some indication of some account >> identifier at some ledger, but for that, you would need some more mechanics >> than just the opaque URI scheme. An interesting approach to that problem is >> Interledger addresses, for instance. >> >> I would say there are generally two types of vouchers, relational (where >> the issuer has some social connection to the redeemer) and anonymous (where >> the voucher has a more universal value, against some anonymous "bubble"). >> If you're interested in peer-to-peer vouchers rather than anonymous ones, >> then may I take this opportunity to plug the Network Money mailing list I >> started last year, particularly this post in which I concluded that maybe >> peer-to-peer money is in the end not really what people want: >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/network-money/Z2zAyX1R8Xo. >> >> Cheers, >> Michiel. >> >> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 5:02 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I have written a payment server that can use arbitrarily many >>> authentication methods on the web. >>> >>> The outcome of that authentication is to return a verified URI. You >>> could think of it as a super set of WebID, DID, user addresses and so on. >>> >>> One thing I'd like to do is have a voucher system. So the idea with a >>> voucher is that it has a special code, say you email it to someone, or have >>> a scratch card or something. >>> >>> Then when that code is shown the back end is able to let the user spend >>> whatever balance it is for. So it's a long the lines of a voucher, a >>> shared secret or a one time password. >>> >>> This may be similar to a bearer token, im not sure, as Im not so >>> familiar with those. >>> >>> My question in all this is, given that I need a URI that is linked to >>> the voucher. Is there something existing I can use. Or, is there some >>> sensible standard we can start experimenting with. >>> >>> The idea I had was to use the URI >>> >>> *urn:voucher:12345abcd ...* >>> >>> And if that appears in the request you know. the user can spend the >>> voucher, and that allows me to build an app. >>> >>> Any thoughts, ideas or previous work that can be reused here? >>> >>
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2019 13:13:00 UTC