Re: The Security Vocabulary status

Thanks for explaining IT’s version of language. 

However, that is unacceptable.  Please choose words that are descriptive and use a standard dictionary.  

Sent from my iPhone

> On 26 Jul BE 2561, at 6:00 AM, Ricardo Morin <morinricardo@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrew:
> 
> Yes, it probably needs some work.
> 
> > 1.  'digest' is undefined.  Not a good choice of word.  Ambiguous.  Are we eating something?
> Actually in the context of cryptography this term is not ambiguous at all
> 
> >2.  parentClass is an Owl?  Why is a bird referenced.  Choose another word.
> Owl is the Web Ontology Language standard. Again in the context of an ontology it is widely used since it provides the foundation ontology from which others derive.
> 
> >3. The first class mentioned has an 'algorithm' and 'value'?  For what?  What's the purpose?
> The purpose is to generate a 'digest' -- for example SHA-256, and the value is the computed 'digest' value. Nothing ambiguous about that either.
> 
> >4.  The title seems ok, but why is 'The' used?
> Yes, the The seems a bit presumptuous :)
> 
> I hope someone from the Web Payments community can answer my questions though.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ricardo  
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 6:28 AM Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That certainly needs a lot of work.  
>> 
>> 1.  'digest' is undefined.  Not a good choice of word.  Ambiguous.  Are we eating something?
>> 
>> 2.  parentClass is an Owl?  Why is a bird referenced.  Choose another word.
>> 
>> 3.  The first class mentioned has an 'algorithm' and 'value'?  For what?  What's the purpose?  The class should be an abstract class or something that defines the entry point.  Or, a data structure that encapsulates the desired result.  
>> 
>> 4.  The title seems ok, but why is 'The' used?
>> 
>> 
>> I don't want to 'digest' any more of the document.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Ricardo Morin <morinricardo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> 
>>> I ran across The Security Vocabulary and it looks like is has been stale since 2016. I also could not find the rdf representation of the vocabulary -- the link to https://w3id.org/security# redirects to https://web-payments.org/vocabs/security# and there is no rdf+xml or ld+json content available.
>>> 
>>> Could someone please give an update on this effort? If dead, can you recommend a similar project that is actively being maintained?
>>> 
>>> Thank you very much,
>>> 
>>> Ricardo Morin
>>