- From: Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 18:37:39 -0500
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff@gmail.com>, Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPS+YFLDENGJACCGdPmMcZLUEDyUcj+=zgdc77MDONUCVK7wdg@mail.gmail.com>
Verification could occur automatically or by asking the recipient. Note the "Deliver" event below that receives verification from Paypal of delivery. Christine also verified: CommerceID EventType Description Andrew Offer $20 Andrew Terms Lasagna Computer Notice "This is a legal offer." Christine Terms $25 Christine Counter-offer Andrew Accept Computer Notice "This is a binding contract." Christine Deliver Lasagna Andrew Complete Andrew Deliver $25 Computer Notice "Paypal verification." Christine Complete Computer Notice "Contract complete." Each event can fire a "snippet" to run custom code. Andrew B. Brown 10723 River Plantation Drive Austin, Texas 78747 (512) 947-8282 http://linkedin.com/in/keihatsu On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 25 July 2016 at 00:44, Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ...except ethereum classic is trading at 0.92$ and ethereum-non-classic >> is trading at 12.77$....together less than they were not that long before >> the fork was first announced. That said there are interesting incentives >> going on wrt mining, and a full flight of capital hasn't happened, but >> still: not quite the 'double spend both coins at risen price' effect >> > > Good point. The the price has risen post fork. More on this story. > > > https://cointelegraph.com/news/realm-of-ethereum-splits-into-two-coins-volume-hashrate-of-etc-surges > > What Id like to point out is that double spending coins in two markets > should now be considered a reality, and not necessarily, a catastrophe. > > I suggest that conceptually it's a game changer. > > >> >> On 24 July 2016 at 16:25, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Jesse Schell one said, "does anyone remember when the term 'viral' meant >>> bad?" >>> >>> There is a very interesting development in digital payments this weekend >>> when ethereum created a hard fork in order to redistribute capital. >>> >>> The community was split on whether or not this was a good idea, and in >>> the end it happened anyway. >>> >>> But something strange happened. >>> >>> Someone created a fork of the original code base called "ethereum >>> classic" >>> >>> What this meant was that anyone with a balance on either ethereum fork >>> would automatically achieve a double spend of those electronic coins. >>> >>> Contrary to popular wisdom the market has responded by rising the price >>> of both double spent coins, rather than, a flight of capital. >>> >>> We live in interesting times. We now have two ethereum chains fighting >>> for supremacy with different algorithms. >>> >>> Anyone who bought in has essentially doubled their capital, as of now, >>> due to double spend acting as a feature, rather than a bug! >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any >> forum and add 1 to the generation >> >> >
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2016 23:38:12 UTC