- From: Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:44:16 -0500
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAR2Wu-mmvWsFAJFsT5-o8TJ=XTHXGVnEhsOWs5yv1yV-fCW7g@mail.gmail.com>
...except ethereum classic is trading at 0.92$ and ethereum-non-classic is trading at 12.77$....together less than they were not that long before the fork was first announced. That said there are interesting incentives going on wrt mining, and a full flight of capital hasn't happened, but still: not quite the 'double spend both coins at risen price' effect On 24 July 2016 at 16:25, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > Jesse Schell one said, "does anyone remember when the term 'viral' meant > bad?" > > There is a very interesting development in digital payments this weekend > when ethereum created a hard fork in order to redistribute capital. > > The community was split on whether or not this was a good idea, and in the > end it happened anyway. > > But something strange happened. > > Someone created a fork of the original code base called "ethereum classic" > > What this meant was that anyone with a balance on either ethereum fork > would automatically achieve a double spend of those electronic coins. > > Contrary to popular wisdom the market has responded by rising the price of > both double spent coins, rather than, a flight of capital. > > We live in interesting times. We now have two ethereum chains fighting > for supremacy with different algorithms. > > Anyone who bought in has essentially doubled their capital, as of now, due > to double spend acting as a feature, rather than a bug! > -- GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2016 22:45:04 UTC