- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 14:39:19 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-webpayments@w3.org
> On 30 Apr 2016, at 14:11, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On 04/19/2016 01:30 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: >> WebCrypto - In "progress" since 2012 ... and still no interoperable >> standard. > > On 04/30/2016 12:34 AM, Harry Halpin wrote: >> For example, your WebPKI work to reproduce PKI in XML has, I believe, >> zero adoption. > > On 04/30/2016 04:08 AM, Henry Story wrote: >> Harry is actually acting as a conceptual guard placed in front of a >> conceptual door. > > Hey guys, it would be more productive to have this discussion without > the hyperbole and personal attacks (those just make your arguments easy > to dismiss/ignore). > > There are sections of each of your emails that are very healthy > discussion points. Constructive criticism is good, but let's please not > attack the work of other people trying very hard to solve a problem. > > We all want better security, open standards, and massive adoption. Not > all of us take the exact same path to get there, and that's okay. > > We're a community of individuals working together to solve some of the > toughest technical problems on the Web. We'll make faster progress by > focusing on the technical issues as well as strategies for adoption. Certainly. I am only asking that Harry stand up to the standards required by W3C Staff, and not just make statements such as the following >> There isn't such a thing really as 'trusted UI' that >> users understand and there isn't a unified thing such as 'trusted storage.' but actually point to evidence backing up that statement. Given that this is such an important sticking point, it seems that this will require a group to be formed to carefully go over the arguments in a principled manner. Somewhat along the lines of what the W3C TAG is doing on client certificates https://github.com/w3ctag/client-certificates If these arguments have already been made, I'd like to see a conclusive document regarding that. Pointers to e-mail threads won't do. Henry > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching > https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/ >
Received on Saturday, 30 April 2016 13:39:46 UTC