- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 19:28:03 +0200
- To: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Cc: Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+eFz_LRG22SNs4y=4UeUiE0cj00BwEaky5XDLmAVfmAO3Q6Gg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for these. I think the first is a great improvement and I'll just copy it verbatim. I am not convinced that direct reference to UNCITRAL in such a high level document is the right approach. Bear in mind that while these are "global" model laws there is not legislation based on these models enacted in all territories. I think these models provide a great reference for what must be considered but should not be the framework upon which we base legal and regulatory compliance of this architecture. I also don't think we should change "regulatory" to "legal" as there are obligations that are set by regulators that must be considered. I know you will argue that these regulators are empowered by law but in some cases (such as a payment scheme mandate) non-compliance is not really illegal. On 20 May 2015 at 18:13, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote: > I would like to offer the follow two adjustments to the "Vision Statement" > > *** > > CURRENT TEXT: > *Increases payers' choice of how to make payments.* We seek to enable > people to pay with their preferred payment instruments and payment schemes > and to increase the choice of payment instruments and payment schemes > available to them. > > PROPOSED: > *Provides payees and payers unencumbered knowledge and choice in how to > undertake payments.* It is consistent with purpose of the Web to enable > payees to receive payments, and payers to pay, using their preferred > payment instruments and payment schemes. The Web payments architecture must > not restrict these choices. > > *** > > CURRENT TEXT: > *Facilitates compliance with regulatory obligations.* The Web is a global > system and thus we do not believe we will conceive of a payments > architecture that satisfies all regulatory obligations in detail. The > group, therefore, envisions a minimal set of “hooks” that enable different > parties to meet the regulatory requirements in their jurisdictions. > > PROPOSED: > *Facilitates compliance with legal obligations.* As the Web is a global > system, the Web payments architecture will align to current official > interpretations of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Credit Transfers > [1] and the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce [2]. It is left to > implementers and users to meet the legal requirements in their > jurisdictions of operation. > > [1] UNCITRAL Model Law on International Credit Transfers > http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/payments.html > [2] UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce > http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/electronic_commerce.html > > > -- > Joseph Potvin > Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations > The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman > jpotvin@opman.ca > Mobile: 819-593-5983 > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > >> >> > On May 20, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL < >> ryladog@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > I propose to add privacy in the sentence: >> > Supports a wide spectrum of security and privacy needs to meet industry >> > and regulatory expectations. >> > >> > I would also add that the word accessibility be added to the sentence >> as well, as it also falls under industry and regulatory expectations. >> >> I prefer that we focus in that bullet on Security. Accessibility is >> covered earlier in the doc. >> Ian >> >> > >> > >> > >> > * katie * >> > >> > Katie Haritos-Shea >> > Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) >> > >> > Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile >> | Office: 703-371-5545 >> > >> > From: Adrian Hope-Bailie [mailto:adrian@hopebailie.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 10:07 AM >> > To: Kepeng Li >> > Cc: David Ezell; Ian Jacobs; Manu Sporny; Web Payments IG; Web Payments >> CG >> > Subject: Re: [Payments Architecture] A vision statement for the web >> payments architecture work >> > >> > All suggestions incorporated. >> > >> > On 20 May 2015 at 08:48, Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: >> >> > Supports a wide spectrum of security needs to meet industry and >> >> >regulatory expectations. >> >> >> >> >> >> I propose to add privacy in the sentence: >> >> Supports a wide spectrum of security and privacy needs to meet industry >> >> and regulatory expectations. >> >> >> >> >> >> In the use case document, we have already mentioned some privacy >> >> requirements, and we have also talked about minimizing the exposure of >> >> sensitive information in the subsequent bullets. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Kind Regards >> >> >> >> Kepeng Li >> >> Alibaba Group >> >> >> >> >> >> 在 20/5/15 8:25 am, "David Ezell" <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 写入: >> >> >> >> >That's good. >> >> > >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >> >From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] >> >> >Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 8:07 PM >> >> >To: David Ezell >> >> >Cc: Manu Sporny; Web Payments IG; Web Payments CG >> >> >Subject: Re: [Payments Architecture] A vision statement for the web >> >> >payments architecture work >> >> > >> >> >* PGP Signed by an unknown key >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> On May 19, 2015, at 3:10 PM, David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Folks: >> >> >> >> >> >> Ian wrote: >> >> >>> * Supports a wide spectrum of security needs to meet industry and >> >> >>>regulatory expectations. >> >> >>> To meet regulatory requirements and give people enough >> confidence to >> >> >>>use the Web for >> >> >>> payments, the architecture must support a wide spectrum of >> security >> >> >>>requirements and >> >> >>> solutions. This includes the ability to encrypt strongly both >> >> >>>sensitive information and the >> >> >>> channels used to exchange the information, as well as supporting >> an >> >> >>>evolving variety of >> >> >>> authentication techniques (multifactor, biometric, etc.). Trust >> in >> >> >>>the Web of payments >> >> >>> is critical to its success. >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, all good. Gives a list of things that will be included. >> Somehow >> >> >>(and there's a lot there already) I think it should say what we will >> >> >>attempt >not< to require. >> >> >> Perhaps a second bullet for clarity: >> >> >> "* Minimizes (eliminates?) reliance on Personally Identifiable >> >> >>Information (PII) to fulfill any requirements.” >> >> > >> >> >How about: >> >> > >> >> >* Supports a wide spectrum of security needs to meet industry and >> >> >regulatory expectations. >> >> > Trust in the Web of payments is critical to its success. >> >> > To meet regulatory requirements and give people confidence to use >> the >> >> >Web for >> >> > payments, the architecture must support a wide spectrum of security >> >> >requirements and >> >> > solutions. This includes minimizing what sensitive information is >> >> >shared as well as the ability >> >> > to encrypt that information (both in transit and when stored). The >> >> >architecture will also need >> >> > to support an evolving variety of authentication techniques >> >> >(multifactor, biometric, etc.). >> >> > >> >> >Ian >> >> > >> >> >-- >> >> >Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >> >> >Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >* Unknown Key >> >> >* 0x0ECB09CB >> >> >________________________________ >> >> >This electronic message, including attachments, is intended only for >> the >> >> >use of the individual or company named above or to which it is >> addressed. >> >> >The information contained in this message shall be considered >> >> >confidential and proprietary, and may include confidential work >> product. >> >> >If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any >> >> >unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this >> message >> >> >is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, >> please >> >> >notify the sender by replying to this message and deleting this email >> >> >immediately. >> >> >> >> -- >> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >> >> >> >> > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 17:28:34 UTC