- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 16:38:38 +0200
- To: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Cc: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLEMB+rtRSNQ9Ezhbp_QYX0OzyDR_MLRPEsT6UXZR4_Sg@mail.gmail.com>
On 14 May 2015 at 16:08, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote: > I would like to raise a general consideration to the CG list: > > What aspects of a "Web Payments: Technical Architecture" are unique to > "Web" mediated payment, what what aspects are generic to payment via any > medium? > > It seems to me that a generic payments technical architecture provides the > functional system environment within and upon which a Web payments > technical architecture occurs. Therefore it seems to me critical to > clearly separate these two in the document. > > The thought I'm attempting to underline is that a Web Payments Technical > Architecture must point to an explicit external source that provides a > generic Payments Achitecture, preferably one provided and maintained by a > genuine global standards body, or something that in effect serves that > function. The generic Payment Architecture ought to be sufficiently refined > as to be consistent across all media > > A Web Payments Technical Architecture must (I would have thought) restrict > its additive scope to that which is within the domain of the W3C, while > explicitly referencing (in its text and diagrams) the generic Payments > Achitecture that it is engaging. > Web arch is about naming things using URIs as per awww [1]. The payments work builds on that, and leverages other web technologies such as HTTP, linked data, JSON LD etc. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ > > -- > Joseph Potvin > Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations > The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman > jpotvin@opman.ca > Mobile: 819-593-5983 >
Received on Thursday, 14 May 2015 14:39:06 UTC