- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 14:57:52 -0400
- To: Brooks Boyd <boydb@midnightdesign.ws>, public-webpayments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5543CCB0.40306@digitalbazaar.com>
Thanks, Brooks. The draft has been updated to better match the JSON-LD context. That draft is in need of attention in general, so there may be other issues -- we just haven't had the spare cycles to clean it up or bring it and a few other related draft specs [1][2] in line with one another. [1] https://web-payments.org/specs/source/secure-messaging/ [2] https://web-payments.org/specs/source/ld-signatures/ On 04/22/2015 10:46 AM, Brooks Boyd wrote: > As I was perusing and attempting implementation of the Security > Vocabulary draft, I ran into an issue with the "data" property of an > "EncryptedMessage" class: > > https://web-payments.org/specs/source/vocabs/security.html#data > > The draft document indicates "data" should be the property to hold an > EncryptedMessage's encrypted payload, while "cipherAlgorithm" holds > the name of the encryption used. However, the JSON-LD context document > hosted at https://w3id.org/security/v1 has no "data" element, though > it has a "cipherData" element that seems to fit the naming scheme > alongside "cipherAlgorithm". > > One of the two should probably be updated, since putting the example > cited in the draft document under the "data" property into the JSON-LD > playground (http://tinyurl.com/p2gdacw) skips over the "data" element > as unrecognized. > > Brooks -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc. http://digitalbazaar.com
Received on Friday, 1 May 2015 18:58:15 UTC