Re: Web Payments Interest Group 2015 NYC face-to-face meeting reading list

To add, UBL is listed as an important external reference by the External
Reviews TF [1].

It's definitely on the radar it's just not been looked at in depth yet.

To add to Manu's comments, you'll note that the capabilities document [2]
has now separated out the concepts of payment and commerce. This was
intentional and based on the feedback both you and others have provided so
thanks again.

[1] https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/External_Reviews_Task_Force
[2]
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webpayments/raw-file/default/ED/capabilities/2015-06-13/index.html

On 14 June 2015 at 17:51, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> On 06/13/2015 12:18 PM, Joseph Potvin wrote:
> > Thanks Manu, This is a useful list (also convenient for review ahead
> > of the Faster Payments Task Force meeting).
> >
> > RE: ISO 12812 Summary (20 minutes)
> >
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015May/att-0011/Executive_Summary_of_ISO_12812_05012015.pdf
> >
> > Good to include that. However did the IG determine that ISO/IEC 19845
> > (UBL) has no direct relevance to the scope of the Web Payments IG'd
> > work?
> >
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/A_Quick_Introduction_to_UBL_Oriented_to_Payment_Solutions_Designers
>
> Thank you for the write-up Joseph, it was very helpful.
>
> The issue hasn't been discussed in depth, but I think the last
> conversation we had about UBL noted that it was important for us to
> analyze and take seriously. I expect that the end result would most
> likely be adopting a subset of the vocabularies/terms defined by UBL.
>
> > Has the IG simply not had the time to consider this in particular? Or
> > is there opposition within the IG to ISO/IEC 19845?
>
> It's a time issue. There is no opposition to using the parts of UBL that
> make sense to re-use (like invoices and tax expression, for example).
>
> It's on our very long and growing "list of things to analyze". I imagine
> that it'll get far more focus when we start designing the vocabularies
> and terminology for the invoices and digital receipts portion of the
> work. I expect that we will reuse a very large portion of the
> vocabulary/terminology and may re-use some of the data structures.
>
> None of this is an official position of the group, it's just a response
> to your comments to re-assure you that the summarization work you did
> was useful (thank you!) and that we will eventually get around to
> looking at UBL in depth.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice
> https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/
>
>
>