- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:42:44 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Web Payments CG [public-webpayments@w3.org] <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLrwL3pcmWA6cM_agmVPAEY+1=VUZgbyKOLNwV+OeoFyw@mail.gmail.com>
On 21 January 2015 at 06:34, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 01/20/2015 04:36 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > I like the separation of legacy finance and future finance. But the > > charter is heavily slanted to legacy finance. Bitcoin or crypto > > currencies are mentioned nowhere by the editors. In theory the > > specs are neutral to the currency, but for me there's an editorial > > bias there. > > I'm assuming you mean this group, because the Web Payments IG mentions > enabling cryptocurrencies in various sections in their official W3C > charter. :) > > We stayed away from mentioning cryptocurrencies because of this line: > > """ > Technologies that are vital for the proper operation of the solutions > listed above, but that are not incubated via any other standardization > body under a W3C-compatible licensing mechanism. > """ > > "Technologies that are vital" is basically anything anyone in this group > thinks is important to work on and is willing to spend the time to write > a spec and do an implementation of their idea. This group does > experimental work and should be far more wild west than the official W3C > Web Payments IG. > > As for the existing specs, they don't say anything about Bitcoin and > cryptocurrencies because we haven't had the spare bandwidth to integrate > them yet. We've always hoped that someone would step forward and do the > hard work necessary in both the specs and the implementations to make > this happen, but it hasn't happened yet. Would love it if it did. Or, > come up with a competing set of specs - we'd love that too (there is no > better way to harvest fresh ideas and put the current specs through the > ringer than that). :) > Great, is exactly what I'm working on. We already have started work on an ontology. I have modelled bitcoin already but not yet ripple. The basic crypto currency work flow is actually very simple. My current focus is a layer on top of the block chain to allow transactions to scale from 5 per second to about 50,000 per second using a commodity server. Will write things up over the course of the year. > > > > It's just not 100% clear the overlap of this work and the specs > > produced. I'll definitely be trying to reuse as much of she specs > > produced here as possible. But I dont know how to make bitcoin more > > prominent in this group other than to create implementations. > > +1, that's exactly how you do it. Write a spec, do an implementation. > It's the only way stuff gets traction around here. :) > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments > http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 09:43:16 UTC