- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:15:57 -0400
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5420756D.2030702@openlinksw.com>
On 9/22/14 11:32 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: > On 2014-09-22 13:16, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 9/22/14 2:31 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: >>> I'm by no means an enemy to Linked Data, I just don't see what it >>> would do for *conventional* payments except for introducing privacy >>> and access control concerns. >> >> Please take time to digest: >> >> [1] >> http://bit.ly/enterprise-identity-management-and-attribute-based-access-controls >> [2] >> http://bit.ly/loosely-coupled-read-write-web-and-web-access-controls-using-webid >> . >> >> You cannot make a moderately usable system without an identification >> mechanism that isn't yet another data silo. >> >> *conventional* payments are an application of data driven >> identification, interaction, and management. > > My only ambition has been describing how you could "webify" an > existing payment system, > *without* changing data ownership, relationships, business-, trust-, > or privacy-models. You can't achieve that goal, in any non contradictory way, if you've somehow convinced yourself that Linked Open Data and Webify aren't inextricably linked. "*without* changing data ownership, relationships, business-, trust-, or privacy-models." is just another way of saying: structured data representation + entity relationship semantics, without data-silo-fication. That's exactly what RDF based Linked Open Data is fundamentally about, period [1]. > > Since the main problem with identity information is not the > information itself but > how it will be used after being submitted, it seems like a safe(r) bet > minimizing > exposure of such data. Linked Open Data never means "uncontrolled or unconstrained access to data" [1]. > This is a corner-stone of my write-up. Another example is > FIDO which (at least on paper...) is the opposite to Linked Data since > each site > is supposed to be an identity silo. In practice FIDO doesn't work as > Google claims > but that's altogether different discussion :-) You can conditionally constrain access to data using data access policies. [1] http://bit.ly/enterprise-identity-management-and-attribute-based-access-controls -- presentation that covers Linked Open Data and Attribute based Access Controls working in tandem. Kingsley > > Anders > > > >> >> Your point is inherently contradictory. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Kingsley Idehen >> Founder & CEO >> OpenLink Software >> Company Web:http://www.openlinksw.com >> Personal Weblog 1:http://kidehen.blogspot.com >> Personal Weblog 2:http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >> Twitter Profile:https://twitter.com/kidehen >> Google+ Profile:https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about >> LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen >> Personal WebID:http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this >> > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 19:16:21 UTC