- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:10:03 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>
- CC: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On 2014-10-29 20:11, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > <snip> > If the browser is in the critical path, If it not, why bother with W3C standardization? The market value with W3C standardization is not that great but the cost is very high including the loss of people who cannot work like required by the W3C processes. > it should be statedexactly which feature is lacking, for what > use case, and preferably how it could be fixed, imho. Secure AND Convenient payments have been an elusive goal for twenty years. Do we have the answer to that? Is it really comparable to Apple Pay for the web? This is also a question for W3C since the FIDO alliance in record-time got all the members that a payment initiative would need, from Security-HW-vendors to Alibaba. Anders
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2014 20:10:47 UTC