- From: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:45:38 -0400
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKcXiSquxnApxiuQsu=0RqCzEat3ntFLAB1cUujY9AD6RZmB6w@mail.gmail.com>
I always assumed that the browser would simply interact with any spec-compliant digital wallet, and that the owner of the funds has the prerogative to decide the whereabouts and characteristics of their digital wallet. The browser would just as easily interact with a digital wallet that's on the local client device, on a local area network device or server, ... , or in "the cloud". In this context, the fund-owner's online-banking account is (from the use case point of view) just another sort of wallet that a service provide (i.e. a bank) looks after for a fee. Is the outcome of CG discussion something different than what I have summarized here? Joseph Potvin On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > > On 28/10/14 16:40, Mountie Lee wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I have a doubt about payment wallet as w3c standard. >> >> if wallet is implemented inside of browser, >> will it cause the wallet locked into specific browser? >> >> if user initiated wallet in firefox, is the content of wallet viewable in >> chrome? >> > > That's exactly why the wallet should be decoupled from the browser as I > proposed in my presentation. We should aim to enable a level playing field > and avoid giving control to the browser vendor, device vendor or mobile > network operator, etc. > > -- > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > > > -- Joseph Potvin Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman jpotvin@opman.ca Mobile: 819-593-5983
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:46:27 UTC