- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:13:39 -0400
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <544FA493.1070000@openlinksw.com>
On 10/28/14 3:44 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie wrote: > The majority of the market commentators believe that MCX is going to > go the way of the dodo and that Apple Pay will ultimately be accepted > at the tills of these retailers. > > The problem MCX have is that they are disabling Apple Pay to promote > their own system CurrentC which tries to bypass the card networks by > debiting user's chequing accounts directly. > Why is this a problem? > 1. The system is poorly designed and a lot harder to use than simply > swiping a card. > 2. As yet their is no incentive for customers to use CurrentC (it's > not actually available to use yet) and by the time it launches in > early-2015 expect Apple Pay to be able to match any loyalty or coupon > system CurrentC offers. > 3. Apple Pay doesn't share your identity with merchants and Apple > doesn't track your spending either. The merchants don'tlike that but > surprise surprise, consumers do. > 4. Consumers like using their credit cards because of the consumer > protection tied to it > 5. Some of the biggest retailers have recently had significant data > breaches and yet they expect their customers to use an app that > requires them to provide data to the retailer that would give the > retailer the ability to debit funds directly from their chequing accounts. > > Basically, the MCX retailers are desperate to cut out the card > networks (to reduce the fees they pay) but are doing this at the > expense of their customers. > Sounds like a bad idea to me. > > Final thought. > Apple Pay is a token based contactless payment mechanism using > biometric security to secure the client. Today it uses tokens that are > processed on card networks to authorise the payment against a card. > If a new better payment mechanism (push based hopefully) becomes > popular what is stopping Apple from integrating this into Apple Pay? > Why is it impossible to imagine that the TouchId can't be used > eventually to unlock a locally stored Bitcoin wallet (or similar - the > 10 minute clearing on Bitcoin is a problem for b&m sales) and make a > payment. +1 Kingsley > > On 28 October 2014 08:46, Anders Rundgren > <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com <mailto:anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > http://www.cnet.com/news/apple-caught-in-the-middle-of-feud-between-merchants-credit-card-companies/ > > In most EU countries payments using payment cards do not involve > the card networks. > > Apple must have overlooked that fact... > > This is why the WebCrypto++ payment demo was designed to be > equally suitable for the > big credit card networks as for bank-to-bank and ACH transactions. > > Unlike the cards used in the physical world that comes with a > credit-card brand as well, > you would probably enroll separate virtual cards for reasons like > fee differentiation, > branding and simply to get a cleaner design. > > Anders > https://mobilepki.org/WebCryptoPlusPlus > > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:14:03 UTC