- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:13:10 -0700
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <7FEEF358-CA62-4414-94C6-996D43880FEE@greggkellogg.net>
On Oct 19, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 19 October 2014 20:45, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >> On 10/15/2014 11:36 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> > Congrats Manu, and all. Lots of very hard work paying off! >> > >> > Are you not going to chair this group? >> >> No, I'm not and that's a good thing for a number of reasons: >> >> 1. The chairs for official W3C work need to come from large industry >> players to signal to other large industry players that we have the right >> organizations at the table. Dave Ezell is from the retail space, >> specifically the National Association of Convenience Stores (if you buy >> gasoline, you use their services). Erik Anderson is from Bloomberg, >> which is a big player and trusted name in the finance world. >> >> 2. It lets me focus on representing the use cases and specs that have >> been developed in this community without raising concerns about the >> chairs having a conflict of interest. >> >> I have been asked to chair some of the technical work, and I've pushed >> back a bit because I don't want a perceived (or real) conflict of >> interest to be used against the work that we're doing here. >> >> For example, an organization that doesn't want the W3C to succeed in >> this endeavor could accuse the technical working group of playing >> favorites by appointing a person that has a technical horse in the race >> to a position of leadership. In reality, the argument is spurious, but >> it would waste precious time convincing people that the W3C formal >> objection and voting process is there to prevent such a thing from >> happening. I've never heard of a rogue chair in W3C ignoring consensus, >> but if such a thing were to happen, they'd quickly find themselves removed. >> >> So, I may chair some future technical work if I'm asked to do so, but >> only if we can't find someone better and the perceived conflict of >> interest is low to non-existent. I think W3C has chosen very wisely for >> the Web Payments IG chairs. I know both of them and trust that they will >> do a splendid job once the IG finds its footing. >> >> So, while I don't think I will be chairing anything any time soon, >> Digital Bazaar (for profit), the Open Payments Foundation (non-profit), >> and the Web Payments CG (R&D / tech / civil society) will be deeply >> involved and represented in the official W3C work that will happen over >> the next several years. > > Thanks for explaining. You are a great chair, and even better on the technical side. It's going to be good that some of your time is (potentially) freed up. > +1 Gregg >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments >> http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/ >
Received on Sunday, 19 October 2014 19:13:41 UTC