W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webpayments@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Web Payments IG (Steering Group) Charter - Final Call for Comments

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:05:53 -0400
Message-ID: <53CF1881.9030105@digitalbazaar.com>
To: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>, public-webpaymentsigcharter <public-webpaymentsigcharter@w3.org>, Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
CC: David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>
On 07/16/2014 01:31 PM, Joseph Potvin wrote:
> David's tongue-in-cheek comment carries an element of insight that 
> ought to be addressed. Terminology does matter in communication, 
> contracting and litigation, and my thoughts are:
> 
> 1. Neither the financial world nor the technology world need yet 
> another glossary to be maintained.

+1

> W3C has a mandate for a certain domain of standards, but this does 
> not extend to all the terminology touched by its use cases.

+1

> I'm only saying that the W3C is not the place for the WB or any 
> organization to introduce terminology that differs from UNCITRAL and 
> the ISO terms.

+1

That said, I wouldn't want to see a situation where we're waiting on
UNCITRAL or ISO for years while they try to define a word for us to use
for a new electronic commerce concept around cryptocurrency. In that
case, we can mention in the spec that the terminology is non-standard
and is being defined and used in the specification until better
terminology comes along and is defined via UNCITRAL/ISO. When the better
terminology comes along, we can update the spec.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments
http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2014 02:06:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:07:32 UTC