W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webpayments@w3.org > July 2014

Re: VOTE: Revised Identity Web Payments Workshop Use Cases

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:00:46 -0400
Message-ID: <53CF174E.4040300@digitalbazaar.com>
To: public-webpayments@w3.org
On 07/16/2014 06:59 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> On 16 July 2014 03:29, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com 
> <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote:
> Please +1/+0/-1 each identity use case below in order to show whether
> or not you agree that we should try and attempt addressing the use
> case in the first iteration of the Web Payments work. 
> ------------------------ +1 to all
> Note: In crypto currency payments, generally a payment is from one 
> public key to another (ie URI to URI), and may not include either a 
> customer or merchant.

Right, so based on feedback so far, it seems like "payer" and "payee"
would be more appropriate terminology.

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2014 02:01:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:07:32 UTC