- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:43:56 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLb5SKJSprmsU+-+hzWKNQDuvgV0yJGwNj6H4_cSY9roQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 10 January 2014 22:55, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Based on concerns raised by PayPal/eBay and discussions with W3C, a > suggestion has been raised that we think about defining the scope of > work that we do here. > > The downside with having a charter is that we could inadvertently turn > people with great Web payments ideas away from this group, or make it > seem like the barrier to entry is too high (or that there is a barrier > there when none exists). > > The upside is that we will all have a better idea of what this group has > agreed to work on. It may also get larger companies into the group that > have been standing on the side lines because their lawyers don't want > them to commit to potentially endless IPR commitments. > > A Web Payments CG Charter proposal has been put together that is meant > to be fairly lightweight from a process perspective, but provide the > lawyers with enough of an idea of the sort of work that we do here: > > > http://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/WebPaymentsCommunityGroupCharterProposal > > Feedback on this direction, changes to the charter, and general thoughts > in this area would be great. Keep in mind: PLEASE DO NOT BIKESHED THE > CHARTER, let's try to keep it simple and not let this discussion > distract us too much from the technical work that we need to do. That > said, thoughts? In particular: > > 1. Is this a good idea? Do we want a charter for this group? > > 2. Is the charter missing anything vital (keeping in mind that we want > to keep this group very lightweight from a process perspective). > > 3. Is there anything in the charter that should be re-worded? > > Once we have the charter in a shape where most of the group thinks we > should vote on it, we will use this online poll to vote on the charter: > > > http://vote.heliosvoting.org/helios/elections/b40f9bee-7a3e-11e3-9dd8-a2f4e5bb7f8c/view > > If 2/3rds of the voters approve of the charter, it will be approved as > our operating charter. > Charter looks good. What was slightly unclear to me was whether work on crypto currencies was in scope or out of scope. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Worlds First Web Payments Workshop > http://www.w3.org/2013/10/payments/ > >
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:44:27 UTC