- From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:32:18 -0700
- To: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On 10/14/13 9:22 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > At the prompting of Pindar, we're going to start writing some of this > design philosophy down, if for no other reason than to provide new > participants in this list a web payments design primer. > > The very first rough draft is now available here: > > https://payswarm.com/specs/source/design-principles/ Good idea, and IMO well laid out and written, and I agree fully with sections 1,3,4, and 5. But section 2, "Maximize Competition", puzzled me, and I'm not sure I agree with its assertions, or whether it's a necessary goal -- or, to put it another way, whether achieving the goal of your example about banks requires the stated beliefs about competition. In section one you've already made it clear that individual empowerment is the first priority: "The Web Payments technologies should focus on empowering the individual, local groups, and large organizations, in that order." I did a thought experiment, and replaced the word "Competition" with "Cooperation" in the whole of section 2. I found it just as plausible as a goal for this group: +++++++ 2. Maximize Cooperation Cooperation simultaneously drives innovation and commoditization of technology. If the goal of the Web Payments group is to empower the individual and get the technology to as many people as possible, then the standards must attempt to maximize cooperation. Keep in mind that this is different from merely promoting cooperation. For example, the standards could be written in such a way as to only push banks to cooperate with each other. However, maximizing the cooperation would enable a larger group than just banks to cooperate in order to provide financial services to customers. Ultimately, the ideal scenario is that the financial service is designed so that the individual doesn't need a 3rd party to gain the benefit of the particular service. ++++++++ So why not have that version as well? Or instead? Or is either one a necessary philosophy, given what the other sections say? Competition versus cooperation seems like a form of the capitalism versus socialism debate, which, I'll venture to suggest, isn't appropriate or necessary for the web-payments mechanism to be completed. Can't we just leave them both out? :-) Steven Rowat
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 17:32:41 UTC