- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 16:29:19 -0400
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Message-ID: <518AB59F.40406@openlinksw.com>
On 5/7/13 2:12 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > On 7 May 2013 19:01, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com > <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote: > > On 05/07/2013 04:04 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > Yeah, I'll ping Julian Reschke or Mark Nottingham about it to see if > > we can update the HTTP header field easily. > > > > +1 > > > > There have been proponents of this for many years e.g. Toby, Nathan, > > Kingsley, myself ... just need to get the spec tweaked to > > distinguish between strings and URIs. > > Do one of you want to take the lead on this? :) > > > Sure, I would be happy to. Kingsley already asked Mark Nottingham > about this last month. Im unsure what the most productive next steps > should be. Mark, Another dimension to the same issue. We can loosen the HTTP spec requirements for "From:" without disrupting existing products that assume the header value is an Email address. All: Do we have any data about how broad current use of "From:" actually is? -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 20:29:41 UTC