- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:59:28 -0400
- To: Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On 07/26/2013 02:50 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 07/26/2013 12:31 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> As such, perhaps you should avoid using the Web and Messaging terms >> least together. > Thanks Art, we'll avoid it. > > The company that initiated the cease and desist have given us until > Sunday to change the name of the spec. > > I agree with some of the others on the list that have said that fighting > this isn't worth it, especially since the case against it would be on > fairly shaky ground (and a huge time sink). > > At the moment, the leading term is "Secure Web Messaging", which would > be shorted to "Web Messaging" based on the conflict with the WebApps > spec that Art points out above. More suggestions welcome until Sunday, > if a strong candidate appears, we'll back it... if not, it's probably > going to be "Secure Messaging". Keep in mind that if we don't like the > name, we can always change it again. Another suggestion that is more specific (and very close to what the spec is actually about) but may have other drawbacks is: "Decentralized Secure Messaging" -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc.
Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 18:59:51 UTC