- From: Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:03:50 -0600
- To: Neil Peters <Neil.Peters@tradeexchange.ca>
- Cc: public-webpayments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAR2Wu_3vyeWhyxVD5rNoAFwG=brtWTo7ZtvBySR5H-9G_hGVg@mail.gmail.com>
Ripple is not a centralized system. The *beta* is currently centralized...because it is not released yet. There is a crucial difference -- when the beta is over, OpenCoin will no longer be a central place for law enforcement, double-spending will be neigh impossible, blocking payments will be impossible etc. This is like suggesting when bitcoin was a project on Satoshi's desktop/IDE of choice that Satoshi himself could break it. Of course he could. These criticisms are, however, more valid on www.villages.cc and previous instantiations of Ripple (whoever runs the server there could reverse transactions/etc) but these threats are not the ones worried about up until recently -- the biggest threat was apathy, and the idea not gaining enough traction to be useful in real life. That has been The threat until 2012, but there's good reason that at this point, we may be finally more or less free of that threat. On 26 April 2013 11:25, Neil Peters <Neil.Peters@tradeexchange.ca> wrote: > The part of the argument that does appear valid is the idea of a Ripple > being a centralized system, and therefore a single point of failure and a > single target for attack, etc. > > > On 26/04/13 01:30 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > >> Interesting commentary on Ripple being a scam: >> >> http://ripplescam.org/ >> >> #bitcoin #ripple #payswarm #w3c #futureofmoney >> >> Some of the arguments are fairly weak, I think the underlying assumption >> that the author is making is that Ripple is attempting to be Bitcoin (it >> isn't, it's a for-profit currency run by a corporation). So, if you >> trust Ripple, most of the arguments go away. >> >> The open source argument is pretty solid, so is the one about hoarding >> of XRPs. The OpenCoin developer arguing in the comment thread certainly >> didn't help defend Ripple. >> >> I think the real argument is whether or not Bitcoin is better than >> Ripple, and in this case, it completely depends on what you want out of >> the currency. Fast transactions? Use Ripple. Decentralized and open >> source? Use Bitcoin. >> >> Any commentary from payment folks on this list? >> >> -- manu >> >> > -- > Neil Peters > The Corporate Trade Network > Cell: 1.506.961.5075 > Toll Free: 1.888.800.4059 > www.CorporateTradeNetwork.com > Skype: N-Crowd > www.LinkedIn.com/in/neilpeters > > > > -- GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation
Received on Saturday, 27 April 2013 18:04:39 UTC