- From: Neil Peters <Neil.Peters@tradeexchange.ca>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:25:23 -0300
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org
The part of the argument that does appear valid is the idea of a Ripple being a centralized system, and therefore a single point of failure and a single target for attack, etc. On 26/04/13 01:30 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > Interesting commentary on Ripple being a scam: > > http://ripplescam.org/ > > #bitcoin #ripple #payswarm #w3c #futureofmoney > > Some of the arguments are fairly weak, I think the underlying assumption > that the author is making is that Ripple is attempting to be Bitcoin (it > isn't, it's a for-profit currency run by a corporation). So, if you > trust Ripple, most of the arguments go away. > > The open source argument is pretty solid, so is the one about hoarding > of XRPs. The OpenCoin developer arguing in the comment thread certainly > didn't help defend Ripple. > > I think the real argument is whether or not Bitcoin is better than > Ripple, and in this case, it completely depends on what you want out of > the currency. Fast transactions? Use Ripple. Decentralized and open > source? Use Bitcoin. > > Any commentary from payment folks on this list? > > -- manu > -- Neil Peters The Corporate Trade Network Cell: 1.506.961.5075 Toll Free: 1.888.800.4059 www.CorporateTradeNetwork.com Skype: N-Crowd www.LinkedIn.com/in/neilpeters
Received on Saturday, 27 April 2013 17:52:54 UTC