- From: Andrew Durham <ad@andrewdurham.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:15:24 +0000
- To: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-webpayments@w3.org
@Dave: Yes, that would work, too, but I think that is essentially the same as #2. However it makes me think of something else, which is that the system could query the collectible amount and show that as the collected amount so everyone knows how a campaign is really going. But that does not prevent the bottom falling out at the last second. It could even lead to sabotage. I think the existing solutions--Kickstarter's and IndieGoGo's (#4) are the best. Re: Tipjar, this is what I said in #4. So there is no legal problem. Furthermore, there is also promised movement on a crowdfunding law next year. Thank god it's sexy. I completely agree: promisor/promisee are not clear. They do not immediately and unequivocally communicate who does what, so further definition is necessary. Two dissimilar terms like proposer/supporters would be much more readable. Andrew
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2012 14:16:21 UTC