public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from February 2020 by thread

[w3c/payment-handler] Permission model (#363) Marcos Cáceres (Thursday, 27 February)

[w3c/payment-handler] See W3C TAG review comments (#362) ianbjacobs (Tuesday, 25 February)

[w3c/payment-request] Use respec shorthand instead of `data-lt` (#899) Janice Shiu (Wednesday, 19 February)

Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Payment request spec references the "Steps to check if a payment can be made" definition which is not exported to xref (#85) Marcos Cáceres (Wednesday, 12 February)

[w3c/payment-method-basic-card] export definition of `steps to check if a payment can be made` (#86) Janice Shiu (Wednesday, 12 February)

Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] add requestSecurityCode member to BasicCardRequest (#78) Marcos Cáceres (Wednesday, 12 February)

Re: [w3c/payment-request] Allow incremental request of billing and shipping address (#873) Marcos Cáceres (Wednesday, 12 February)

Re: [w3c/payment-request] the user interface's language should not be derived from `the body element` (#895) Marcos Cáceres (Wednesday, 12 February)

Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should show() consume user activation? (#886) Marcos Cáceres (Wednesday, 12 February)

Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove recommendation to localize sheet based on body element (#896) Marcos Cáceres (Tuesday, 11 February)

[w3c/payment-request] Expected behaviours: paymentmethodchange event updates with a rejection (#898) MaxG (Friday, 7 February)

[w3c/payment-request] Payment Method - BasicCardErrors not showing (working) (#897) Ronaldo Rigoni (Thursday, 6 February)

Re: [w3c/payment-request] Payment Method Basic Card spec uses various Payment Request definitions that Payment Request does not yet export (#890) Marcos Cáceres (Thursday, 6 February)

Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) Marcos Cáceres (Thursday, 6 February)

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2020 04:19:04 UTC