public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from February 2020 by author

Dave Longley

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Permission model (#363) (Thursday, 27 February)

ianbjacobs

• [w3c/payment-handler] See W3C TAG review comments (#362) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] add requestSecurityCode member to BasicCardRequest (#78) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove recommendation to localize sheet based on body element (#896) (Wednesday, 12 February)

Janice Shiu

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Use respec shorthand instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Use respec shorthand instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• [w3c/payment-request] Use respec shorthand instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] export definition of `steps to check if a payment can be made` (#86) (Wednesday, 12 February)

Manu Sporny

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Permission model (#363) (Thursday, 27 February)

Marcos Cáceres

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Permission model (#363) (Friday, 28 February)
• [w3c/payment-handler] Permission model (#363) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Allow incremental request of billing and shipping address (#873) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Use respec shorthands instead of `data-lt` (#899) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] add requestSecurityCode member to BasicCardRequest (#78) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] add requestSecurityCode member to BasicCardRequest (#78) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] add requestSecurityCode member to BasicCardRequest (#78) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Payment request spec references the "Steps to check if a payment can be made" definition which is not exported to xref (#85) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] export definition of `steps to check if a payment can be made` (#86) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] export definition of `steps to check if a payment can be made` (#86) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] add requestSecurityCode member to BasicCardRequest (#78) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Allow incremental request of billing and shipping address (#873) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove recommendation to localize sheet based on body element (#896) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] the user interface's language should not be derived from `the body element` (#895) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should show() consume user activation? (#886) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove recommendation to localize sheet based on body element (#896) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove recommendation to localize sheet based on body element (#896) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove recommendation to localize sheet based on body element (#896) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove recommendation to localize sheet based on body element (#896) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Payment Method - BasicCardErrors.paymentMethod errors not being displayed (#897) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Payment Method - BasicCardErrors.paymentMethod errors not being displayed (#897) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Payment Method Basic Card spec uses various Payment Request definitions that Payment Request does not yet export (#890) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 6 February)

MaxG

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Expected behaviours: paymentmethodchange event updates with a rejection (#898) (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Expected behaviours: paymentmethodchange event updates with a rejection (#898) (Friday, 7 February)
• [w3c/payment-request] Expected behaviours: paymentmethodchange event updates with a rejection (#898) (Friday, 7 February)

Ronaldo Rigoni

• [w3c/payment-request] Payment Method - BasicCardErrors not showing (working) (#897) (Thursday, 6 February)

Rouslan Solomakhin

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] add requestSecurityCode member to BasicCardRequest (#78) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] add requestSecurityCode member to BasicCardRequest (#78) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Expected behaviours: paymentmethodchange event updates with a rejection (#898) (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Payment Method - BasicCardErrors.paymentMethod errors not being displayed (#897) (Friday, 7 February)

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2020 04:19:04 UTC