- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:02:45 -0700
- To: w3c/payment-request <payment-request@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2018 22:04:18 UTC
> I remain convinced that serializing and passing to the payment handler spec is the right way to spec that property. I don't mind so much (specially if a payment handler `JSON.parse()`s on the other end) - but we still have the problem that you get the wrong data. That's fixable by using `tuple(PMI, serializedData)` - as it's done with `[[serializedMethodData]]`. But the larger question of conversion kinda remains, as does `[[serializedModifierData]]` not actually being applied. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/753#issuecomment-404664970
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2018 22:04:18 UTC