- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 18:54:13 -0700
- To: w3c/payment-request <payment-request@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2018 01:54:43 UTC
@adrianhopebailie thanks for the additional clarification. My working assumption had always been that push payments were akin to tokenized payments (your proposal above is what I had in mind!) - I think that was the source of misunderstanding and confusion on my part - particularly because I didn't understand how a payment could be processed without the merchant having agreed that it was ok to process it and that it was ok. I've not given this a lot of thought yet, but there might be some relationship here to #646 (merchant validation): in that, there is a confirmation via `.complete()` in the MerchantValidationEvent. So, similarly for push payments, there could be a `.complete()` on a similar event to indicate that the push payment can be processed. Anyway, let's finish off the billing thing and circle back to this. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/759#issuecomment-413070352
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2018 01:54:43 UTC