- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 20:20:48 -0700
- To: w3c/payment-request <payment-request@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 8 September 2017 03:21:13 UTC
@rsolomakhin unfortunately, no, for the reason I gave above. So, it's totally correct to *implement* with the CLDR (we do the same in Gecko). But citing the CLDR is still not right for the spec for the two reasons I gave: 1. The CLDR cites "Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49)" (and takes the Alpha-2 codes from ISO, as far as I can tell) 1. M49 cites ISO 3166-1 for the codes. Thus, 3166-1 is the authoritative source for the codes, even if CLDR is how those codes are derived (which is an implementation detail). @adrianhopebailie, [ISO finally came to its senses](https://www.iso.org/new-way-of-using-iso-3166.html) and made the language codes available in multiple formats and searchable: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#search -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/601#issuecomment-327988636
Received on Friday, 8 September 2017 03:21:13 UTC