> I can't find any "[CLDR] (Common Locale Data Repository) region code" You can see the list of region codes at http://unicode.org/cldr/charts/31/supplemental/territory_containment_un_m_49.html, for example. > This should actually be ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 codes. We went with CLDR instead because CLDR is updated more frequently. @lararennie and @roubert: Do you have any examples of where CLDR is better than ISO 3166-1? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/601#issuecomment-327171691
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2017 13:16:51 UTC